Type:Final

Date:05/29/2009

Report:FINAL REPORT_SPEECH_2009_(6) TAB 3wout cover.doc 2009 SPEECH appendices.doc


Table of Contents


2009 Final Recommendations

Laws and Policies 3
History 3
Joint Sunset Review History 4
Proposed Legislation 5
Speech/Language Pathologists and Audiologists 5
Speech/Language Pathology Assistants 5
Audiologists 6
Hearing Aid Dispenser 7
Powers and Duties 7
Audits 8
Administrative Procedures Act 8
Freedom of Information Act 8
Federal Laws, Interagency Agreements, Judicial Decisions,
Memoranda of Understand, and Executive Orders 9

Performance 10
Mission 10
Objectives 10
Accomplishments 11
Challenges 12
Opportunities for Improvement 12
Internal Performance Measures 13
Coordination of Services with other Agencies 13
Customer Satisfaction 13

Organization 13
Policymaking Structure 13
Board Member Training and Compensation 15
Removal of a Board Member 15
Meetings 15
Staff 16
Staff Responsibilities 16
Training 17

Licensing 17
Temporary Licensure 17
License Renewal 17
Fees 18
Reciprocity 18
Licensure for Speech/Language Pathologists and Audiologists 18
Examination 20
Exemptions 20
Licensure for Hearing Aid Dispenser 21
Examination 22


Complaints 22

Disciplinary Action 24
Hearing and Appeals 24
Grounds for Discipline 24
Disciplinary Action by the Board 25
Disciplinary Action by the Justice of the Peace Court 26
Reinstatement of a suspended license; removal from probationary status;
replacement of license 26

Public Information 26

Fiscal 27

2009 Final Recommendations for the Board of Speech Pathologists, Audiologists, and Hearing Aid Dispensers
The Joint Sunset Committee recommends continuance of the Board of Speech Pathologists, Audiologists, and Hearing Aid Dispensers, but only upon its meeting certain conditions or making certain modifications as identified below.

A. Statutory Changes:
1. Change the audiology licensure requirements to a doctoral degree for new audiology applicants, which will encompass the current practicum and fellowship requirements and include a grandfathering provision.

2. Amend the statutory requirements for a hearing aid dispenser to clarify that an audiologist applicant does not need to meet the six months’ training requirement.

3. Amend the Composition of the Board to include 3 speech/language pathologists; 1 hearing aid dispenser, 2 audiologists and 3 members of the public.

4. Amend the reciprocity provision in §3710(a) to clarify that an applicant would need to meet the requirements in both (a)(1) and (a)(2).

5. Amend the statute to permit the Board to issue a combined license for audiologists who also dispense hearing aids.

B. Regulatory Changes:
1. Amend Rule 2.2.1 of the Regulations to reflect ASHA’s required 400 clock hours for a clinical practicum with regard to Speech/Language Pathologists and Audiologists.

C. Action by the Board
1. Examine the feasibility of regulating speech/language assistants. (SLAs)
If SLAs are established, include the members of the DE Speech/Language and Hearing Aid Association (DSHA) when establishing guidelines and qualifications.
If SLAs are established, require them to be highly trained and well supervised by licensed Speech Language Pathologists.
Send a letter to Delaware Technical Community College, the University of Delaware and Delaware State University to work collaboratively with the Board to examine the feasibility of establishing a speech/language assistants program.
Report back to the Joint Sunset Committee with the Board’s progress The report can be filed in the Progress Report filed with the Joint Sunset Committee in September and December following the review.

2. Examine the need for telepractice in Delaware and report back to the Joint Sunset Committee with the Board’s findings. The report can be filed in the Progress Report filed with the Joint Sunset Committee in September and December following the review.

D. Action by the Joint Sunset Committee
1. Send a letter to the University of Delaware and Delaware State University encouraging them to collaborate in an effort to establish a graduate program in speech-language pathology for Delaware residents.
Laws and Policies
History
The following history was contained in the 1993 JSC Final Report:

The Board of Examiners of Speech Pathologists and Audiologists was established in 1973. The Advisory Council to the Division of Public Health on Hearing Aids was also established at the same time. Licensing authority was vested in the Division of Public Health.

In the late 1960’s there was a nation-wide movement for licensure by speech pathologists and audiologists. Currently, forty-seven other states, including Delaware, regulate Speech/Language Pathologists and Audiologists through licensure or registration.

Numerous complaints against hearing aid dealers involved outlandish selling practices, false advertisement, sale of instruments to persons who could not use or did not need amplification, and salespersons operating out of temporary quarters, who could not be located to service products or honor warranties, according to the 1993 JSC Final Report. Delaware did not have an unusually high number of complaints; but, according to the Board, the Attorney General's office "was hard pressed to resolve consumer problems and to discourage such operations." The Attorney General's office strongly recommended licensing legislation for hearing aid dispensers.

The original legislation Chapter 206, 59 Laws of Del. for speech pathologists and audiologists allowed an exemption from the licensing mandate for "a person who holds a valid and current credential as a speech or hearing specialist, issued by the Delaware Department of Public Instruction, if such person practices speech pathology or audiology in a salaried position solely within the confines or under the jurisdiction of the Department of Public Instruction." Practitioners employed by private or parochial schools were not exempt from the licensure provisions of the original law.

The original legislation contained a "grandfather clause" for those practitioners who, "at any time in the two years prior to the effective date of this act, were actively engaged in the practice of speech pathology or audiology in Delaware upon proof of bona fide practice presented to the Board in the manner prescribed by the Board's regulations, providing that they file an application for a license within one year of the effective date of this chapter." Chapter 206, 59 Laws of Del. This window of opportunity closed on July 12, 1974.

The original statute contained reciprocity provisions for those applicants, who were licensed in a state, District of Columbia, or United States territory, which had standards equivalent to Delaware's. Chapter 206, 59 Laws of Del. Applicants who held the Certificate of Clinical Competence of the American Speech and Hearing Association in the area for which they were applying for licensure were granted licensure without having to meet the education and examination requirements.

Joint Sunset Review History
In 1981 the Joint Sunset Committee reviewed and terminated the Advisory Council on Hearing Aids and merged the licensing function under the powers of the Board of Examiners of Speech Pathologists and Audiologists. The name of the Board was changed to the present one at that time. The Board of Speech/Language Pathologists, Audiologists, and Hearing Aid Dispensers was reviewed by the JSC in 1985 and 1993.

The following revisions were made to the Board’s governing statute following the 1993 Joint Sunset Review:

SB214 was enacted in February 2000 implementing the 1993 Joint Sunset Committee Recommendations which included:

adding the customary language regarding the Board’s objectives;

adding customary language regarding Board meetings, nonattendance, and bringing members under the provisions of the Public Integrity Act;

rewriting powers and duties of the Board to include the customary language concerning records, complaints, investigation of complaints;

rewriting qualifications for licensure to include all qualifications in one section of the code; add customary language regarding impairment related to drugs, alcohol, felony or other criminal conviction for all applicants, including reciprocity applicants;

rewriting reciprocity language to require the applicant to present proof of licensure in ‘good standing’ in all states where he or she is or has been licensed; rewriting language regarding issuance and renewal of licenses and completion of continuing education credits;

rewriting the grounds for discipline and including customary language; adding the ability to impose a monetary penalty not to exceed $500 for violations of the statute; rewriting and updating hearing procedures and investigation of complaints.

In June 2004 SB 229 was enacted which created a uniform approach throughout Title 24 requiring that the refusal, revocation or suspension of licenses for professions and occupations regulated under Title 24 be based upon conviction of crimes that are “substantially related” to the profession or occupation at issue, and not for crimes that are unrelated to the profession or occupation. The bill required the boards of affected professions and occupations to promulgate regulations that specifically identify the crimes that are "substantially related" to the profession or occupation within 180 days of the enactment of the bill. The Board promulgated Rule and Regulation 11.0 (Crimes substantially related to the practice of speech/language pathology, audiology and hearing aid dispensing) effective February 1, 2005.

In July 2005, SB 206 was enacted to give protection to active duty military, activated reservists or members of the National Guard from having their professional licenses expire during active military deployments.

In July 2006, SB 183 was enacted to require applicants for hearing aid dispenser to complete six months of training prior to taking the examination. The Board in its Rules and Regulations established the frequency of direct supervision during the training period. Rules and Regulation 3.3.1.3 Licensed audiologists only needed to pass the test to become licensed hearing aid dispensers.

In July 2006, SB 403 was enacted to allow Title 24 boards and commissions to waive convictions substantially related to the professions under certain conditions.

In June 2008, HB 36 was enacted to give all boards and commissions cease and desist authority to address unlicensed practice and to impose fines for those who violate cease and desist orders subject to hearing procedures. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pgs. 4-5

Proposed Legislation
The Board worked with its Deputy Attorney General to draft proposed legislation for the 144th General Assembly, but held off introducing the bill due to the Board’s Joint Sunset Review. If the proposed legislation is adopted, the Board will need to promulgate rules and regulations to implement the legislation. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 7 (Appendix B)

Speech/Language Pathologists and Audiologists
Speech/language pathologists assess, diagnose, treat, and help to prevent disorders related to speech, language, literacy, cognitive functioning, voice, swallowing, and fluency. In educational settings, speech/language pathologists collaborate with teachers, special educators, other educational personnel, and families to enhance educational outcomes for students with communication disabilities. In health care setting, speech/language pathologists work in conjunction with physicians, social workers, psychologists, nutritionists, and other therapy professionals to help individuals overcome the barriers posed by developmental or health conditions that impact communication. Final Report, Governor’s Task Force on Licensed Speech-Language Pathologists, pg. 1

Currently speech/language pathologists are assisted by speech pathology aides. Duties of the aide are prescribed by Regulation and include: assisting with testing or treatment, clerical support, client escort, preparation of therapeutic materials equipment maintenance and participation with research projects or in service training. All work must be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed speech/language pathologist. Board Rules and Regulations, Rule 6.3 This is not a licensed, permitted or certified position.

Speech/Language Pathology Assistants
Thirty four states currently regulate speech-language assistants, although the title and education requirements vary. Speech/Language Pathology Assistants would perform the following duties under the direct supervision of a speech/language pathologist: assist speech-language and hearing screenings (without interpretation), assist with informal documentation as directed by the speech-language pathologist, follow documented treatment plans or protocols developed by the supervising speech-language pathologist, document patient/client performance, assist the speech-language pathologist during assessment of patients/clients, assist with clerical duties such as preparing materials and scheduling activities as directed by the speech-language pathologist, perform checks and maintenance of equipment, support the supervising speech-language pathologist in research projects, in-service training, and public relations programs, and assist with departmental operations, collect data for monitoring quality improvement. http://www.asha.org/about/membership-certification/faq Speech/Language Pathology Assistants would not be used in place of licensed speech/language pathologist.

The Governor’s Task Force on Licensed Speech-Language Pathologists (discussed later in this Report) found that Delaware has a shortage of speech/language pathologists and Delaware’s licensure law preclude practice settings from employing any other providers of service such as speech-language pathology assistants. The Task Force recommended that in an attempt to address the personnel shortage the State explore the possibility of establishing an educational opportunity via collaboration among the University of Delaware, Delaware State University and Delaware Technical and Community College and thus licensing availability for speech-language pathology assistants. Final Report, Governor’s Task Force on Licensed Speech-Language Pathologists, pg. 13

The minutes from the October 8, 2008 Board meeting reflect that there was a discussion among the members regarding the use of Speech/Language Pathology Assistants. The following is an excerpt from those minutes:

A discussion took place regarding the use of SLP Aides or Assistants. The reasons provided for opposing the use of support staff, specifically SLPAs, are as follows: there are no programs in Delaware to train them, to much time would be spent supervising the SLPA, they would have no clinical training, and the quality of service would be compromised. The SLP members of the Board do not feel that Delaware Speech Language Pathologists are in favor of using SLPAs or assistants.

Audiologists
Practice of audiology includes the application of principles, methods and procedures of measurement, testing, evaluation, prediction, consultation, counseling, instruction, habilitation and rehabilitation related to hearing and disorders of hearing for the purpose of evaluating, identifying, preventing, ameliorating or modifying such disorders and conditions in individuals and/or groups. The terms "habilitation" and "rehabilitation" include, but are not limited to, hearing aid evaluation, recommendation, and fitting. 24 Del. C. § 3702(9) Audiologists frequently work with other medical specialists, speech-language pathologists, educators, engineers, scientists, and allied health professionals and technicians. www.asha.org/public/audiology

Audiologists may be assisted by an Audiologist Aide who is certified by the Council of Accreditation of Occupational Hearing Conservationists, or its equivalent, with documentation. The supervising Delaware-licensed audiologist must annually register each Audiology Aide with the Board. Duties of the Audiology Aide include: air conduction pure tone assessment and data recording, hearing screenings, assisting with conditioning techniques, cursory otoscopy, basic hearing aid maintenance, routine instrument sterilization, biologic and electroacoustic assessment of the audiometer, clerical support, participation with the professional in research projects, in service training, or similar endeavors, and other duties as may be appropriately determined with training from and direct supervision of the Delaware licensed audiologist. The Audiology Aide may perform services only under the direct supervision of a licensed audiologist. Board Rules and Regulations, Rule 5.3

Hearing Aid Dispenser
A Hearing Aid Dispenser is a person licensed to dispense hearing aids pursuant to statute and who is engaged in the evaluation or measurement of the power or range of human hearing by means of an audiometer or any other means devised for the purpose of selecting, adapting and distributing or selling of hearing aids. Testing shall not include medical diagnosis or audiologic evaluation. Licensed hearing aid dispensers may provide instruction, orientation and counseling on the use and operation of a hearing aid; and they may use an otoscope or "ear light" to evaluate the feasibility and use of ear molds and ear mold impressions. 24 Del. C. § 3702(7)

Powers and Duties
The Board of Speech/Language Pathologists, Audiologists and Hearing Aid Dispensers has the authority to: 24 Del. C. § 3706

1) Formulate rules and regulations;

2) Designate the application form and process applications;

3) Designate the national, written, standardized examinations;

4) Evaluate the credentials of all persons to determine if qualified;

5) Grant licensees to and renew licenses of all persons who meet licensure qualifications;

6) Establish continuing education standards for license renewal by rule and regulation;

7) Evaluate certified records to determine whether applicants for licensure previously licensed, certified or registered in another jurisdiction meet reciprocity requirements;

8) Refer all complaints from licensees and the public to the Division of Professional Regulation.

9) Conduct hearings and issue orders in accordance with procedures established by statute.

10) Impose the appropriate sanction or penalty after time of appeal has lapsed.

11) Adopt and publish a code of ethics for each professional specialty and promulgate within 60 days of adoption.

12) Establish and publish standards for electronic equipment used for the purpose of measuring hearing, and require written proof of calibration for such equipment annually.


Additionally, statute provides that no member shall participate in any action of the Board involving directly or indirectly any person related in any way by blood or marriage to said member. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pgs. 5-6

Audits
The Board has never been audited by the State Auditor or another external organization. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 8

Administrative Procedures Act
The Board is subject to the Administrative Procedures Act. Statute provides that the Board shall promulgate regulations specifically identifying those crimes which are substantially related to the practice of speech/language pathology, audiology and/or the dispensing of hearing aids. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 6

The Board is assigned a Deputy Attorney General. A thorough review of the statute and the Board’s rules and regulations was completed in August 2007.

Freedom of Information Act
The Deputy Director of the Division of Professional Regulation, in coordination with the Division Director, and in accordance with the Department of State’s FOIA Policy, handles all FOIA requests.

Meeting agendas are posted in the customer service area of the Division of Professional Regulation a well as online of the Sate Calendar of Events. Meeting agendas are posted seven days prior to the meeting date in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act. Agendas can be viewed online at the Division of Professional Regulation’s website at www.dpr.delaware.gov .

Meeting minutes are transcribed for each Board meeting and maintained electronically in the
Board’s office. Minutes are prepared for approval by the Board at the next regularly scheduled meeting. Approved minutes are posted on the online meeting calendar five business days after the meeting in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act. The public can download copies of the approved meeting minutes online or request a hard copy by contacting the Board office.

In accordance with the Delaware Freedom of Information Act, minutes of executive sessions are not public information. Other than executive sessions, all meetings are open to the public. In the last three years, the Board has had one executive session. This session was held on June 11, 2008 for the Board’s Deputy Attorney General to discuss preliminary hearing matters with the Board. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pgs. 7-8

Federal Laws, Interagency Agreements, Judicial Decisions, Memoranda of Understanding and Executive Orders
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act would be applicable to those dispensing hearing aids and the Attorney General’s Office could prosecute a claim under this federal provision. There have been no state or federal judicial decisions that have impacted the Board. There are no memorandums of understanding or interagency agreements. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 8

Executive Order 84 - Task Force on Licensed Speech-Language Pathologists
In 2008, Executive Order 84 established the Task Force on Licensed Speech-Language Pathologists. The charge of the Task Force was to “examine the issues surrounding the shortage of licensed Speech-Language Pathologists in the state and to develop recommendations to address the shortage.” Final Report, Governor’s Task Force on Licensed Speech-Language Pathologists, pg. i

The Task Force’s Final Report included the following findings/recommendations: Final Report, Governor’s Task Force on Licensed Speech-Language Pathologists, pg. i-ii

Fact-finding revealed that the personnel shortage is not the result of a single factor, but rather of a convergence of factors that impacts the availability of qualified personnel and the ability to retain them in existing positions:

Delaware is one of only three states in the country without a graduate program in speech-language pathology. As the master's degree is a condition of licensure in the state, Delaware has no in-state "pipeline" for newly-minted graduates.

Although Delaware has an incentive program through the Higher Education Commission, it impacts a limited number of people, and currently there are no data regarding the success of this program in motivating graduates to return to the state to practice.

A number of factors impact the recruitment of qualified personnel to Delaware positions and the retention of those individuals in existing positions. Among these are compensation issues, workplace conditions—including caseload size— and geography. Delaware lacks a coordinated approach to recruitment and retention.

The licensure law restricts the practice of speech-language pathology in Delaware to certified SLPs, precluding practice settings from employing any other providers of service such as speech-language pathology assistants.


The Task Force endorses a multidimensional solution for a multidimensional problem. The following recommendations reflect the Task Force's commitment to ensure that Delawareans with communication disabilities should receive high-quality speech- language pathology services of adequate frequency and intensity to meet their needs.

Establish a graduate program in speech-language pathology at the University of Delaware.

Establish consolidated recruitment mechanisms.

Establish a mechanism for offering sign-on bonuses for public school positions that incorporates retention incentives (e.g., a payback clause if the individual leaves the position prior to completing the required tenure or the payout of the bonus in installments over multiple years).

Develop materials to attract qualified clinicians to Delaware.

Implement programs designed to attract individuals to careers in communication sciences and disorders.

Analyze the utilization and impact of existing higher education financial incentives to determine whether they are achieving their intended objective.

Examine the ramifications associated with permitting speech-language pathology assistants to practice in Delaware.

Explore the viability of establishing a continuum of professional development opportunities via collaboration among the University of Delaware, Delaware State University, and Delaware Technical and Community College.

Reconvene the Task Force in two years to evaluate progress toward accomplishment of the aforementioned objectives.


Performance
Mission
The Board’s mission is to protect the public and to maintain minimum standards of practitioner competency and certain standards in the delivery of services to the public. However, as mentioned throughout this Draft Report, the Board’s statute does not align with the educational requirements of new students graduating from audiology programs.

The mission of the Division of Professional Regulation is to ensure the protection of the public's health, safety and economic well-being through administrative and investigative services to Governor-appointed boards/commissions JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 15

Objectives
The Board’s primary objective is to protect the general public from unsafe practices and from occupational practices which would reduce competition or fix the price of services rendered.

The secondary objectives of the Board are to maintain minimum standards of practitioner competency and to maintain certain standards in the delivery of services to the public. In meeting its objectives, the Board develops standards assuring professional competence, monitors complaints brought against practitioners regulated by the Board, adjudicates at formal hearings, promulgate rules and regulations; and imposes sanctions when necessary against licensed practitioners. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 15

Accomplishments
The Board listed the following as its most significant accomplishments: JSC Initial Questionnaire, pgs. 13-14

The Board implemented the 1993 Joint Sunset Committee Recommendations (Senate Bill 214).

The Board promulgated final rules and regulations in May 2001to implement Senate Bill 214.

The Board adopted the Voluntary Treatment Option Program for Chemically Dependent or Impaired professionals under the board’s regulatory authority. The rule and regulation was adopted in 2001.

The Board promulgated final rules and regulations to revise continuing education requirements. (April 2003)

The Board promulgated final rules and regulations to implement SB 229 to identify crimes substantially related to the practice of speech-language pathology, audiology and hearing aid dispensing. (February 2005)

The Board promulgated a final rule and regulation to protect the public by ensuring that products and services for hearing aid dispensers are advertised so that the terms of the transaction are clear and understandable. (February 2006) Rule and Regulation 9.3.1.8

The Board initiated SB 183 during the during the 143rd General Assembly to require applicants for hearing aid dispenser to complete six months of training prior to taking the examination.

The Board promulgated final rules and regulations requiring hearing aid dispenser candidates to obtain temporary licensure while completing a six-month training period under the direct supervision of a licensed hearing aid dispenser. The extent of the direct supervision is also delineated. The Board developed a Hearing Aid Training Plan. The Board clarified the required frequency for calibration of electronic equipment used to assess hearing and allow for attestation of such calibration during the license renewal process.(December 2007 )

The Board developed a strategic plan with the goals and objectives to improve communication with licensees, change Board member representation to accurately reflect licensee population and accommodate changes in Audiology education and the profession.

The Board streamlined the renewal process by offering online renewal with the use of payment by credit card and the ability of licensees to attest to their continuing education online subject to post renewal audit.

The Board updated the Division of Professional Regulation’s website to make it more user-friendly for the public to access licensee and disciplinary information and for applicants and licensees to access licensure requirements, laws and rules and regulations.

The Board coordinated with the Department of Education to create a link on their website (Delaware Educator Data System) to the Division of Professional Regulation to communicate to school administrators and speech/language pathologists about licensure and renewal requirements.

The Board drafted a bill during the 144th General Assembly to increase the educational requirements for audiologists from a master’s degree and completion of a supervised clinical practicum and a supervised clinical fellowship to a doctoral degree. The Board also proposed to change the representation on the Board to more accurately reflect the licensee population. Appendix B


Challenges
The Board is currently challenged by the following: JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 14

Moving Delaware in line with the national standard of educational requirements for audiologists. Masters programs for audiology will be phased out by 2009, and as such there will be no more master degree program graduates. The Board will need to change its audiology licensure requirements to a doctoral degree for new audiology applicants, which will encompass the current practicum and fellowship requirements. This change will enable Delaware to be reciprocal with other states’ requirements and allow portability of licensees.

Responding to the Task Force’s recommendations in response to Executive Order Eighty Four created to study licensed speech/language pathologists and examine issues surrounding the shortage of licensed speech/language pathologists in the State of Delaware. A Final Report was issued on June 24, 2008. One of the recommendations was to examine the ramifications associated with permitting speech-language pathology assistants to practice in Delaware.

Looking at emerging issues in the professions such as teletherapy.


Opportunities for Improvement
The Board indicated that the following as areas for improvement: JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 14

Ensure that Delaware’s minimum standards of practitioner competency and the delivery of speech/language pathology, audiology and hearing aid dispensing services are in line with those nationally to ensure the highest level of public protection.

Examine the feasibility of regulating speech/language assistants.

Change the composition of the Board to accurately reflect the licensee population and improve the availability of finding members to serve.

Internal Performance Measures
The Board does not have an internal process to evaluate its performance. However, the Division of Professional Regulation conducts formal and informal performance reviews of staff providing support to the Board. Additionally, the Division develops performance measures through the strategic planning process to evaluate and monitor the progress and performance of the administrative and investigative support provided to the boards and commissions. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 16

Coordination of Services with other Agencies
The Division coordinates with the Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General for legal representation and the Department of Education. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 15

Customer Satisfaction
The Board indicated that its primary customers are: JSC Initial Questionnaire, pgs. 14-15

Speech/language pathology applicants and licensees

Audiology applicants and licensees

Hearing Aid Dispenser applicants and licensees

The public

American Speech/Language and Hearing Association (ASHA)

International Hearing Society

American Academy of Audiology

The Division of Professional Regulation evaluates customer satisfaction through a variety of ways:
Walk-in customers to the Division complete a customer satisfaction log to evaluate the level of service that they receive by staff.

New licensees, licensees who renew online, complainants and respondents involved in the complaint process and Board members are asked to complete an online survey to rate the level of satisfaction with the Division’s services.

The initial customer survey results gave the Division an overall customer satisfaction rating of 4.50 out of 5.0. Customer satisfaction data is used to identify areas of improvement.

Organization
Policymaking Structure
The Board is composed of 9 members who are appointed by the Governor. The members include 3 public members, 2 licensed speech/language pathologists, 2 audiologists and 2 hearing aid dispensers. Senate confirmation is not required. The Board President and Secretary are elected by the Board and serve for 1 year, and cannot succeed himself or herself for more than 2 consecutive terms. Statute provides that “each term of office shall expire on the date specified in the appointment; however, the Board member shall remain eligible to participate in Board proceedings unless or until replaced by the Governor.”

Members serve three year terms and must be residents of Delaware. A member or any member appointed to fill a vacancy may “succeed himself or herself for 1 additional term.” Statute provides: “A person who has never served on the Board may be appointed to the Board for 2 consecutive terms; but no such person shall thereafter be eligible for 2 consecutive appointments. No person who has been twice appointed to the Board or who has served on the Board for 6 years within any 9-year period shall again be appointed to the Board until an interim period of at least 1 term has expired since such person last served.” 24 Del. C. § 3703

BOARD MEMBER
APPOINTMENT EXPIRATION
TERM
Illene Courtright, President
Speech/Language Pathologist
New Castle County
7/30/10
2nd
Mary Ann Connolly Gaskin, Secretary
Audiologist
Sussex County
3/23/09
1st
Michael A. Michelli
Audiologist
New Castle County
7/24/10
2nd
Regina A. Bilton
Speech/Language Pathologist
New Castle County
11/07/10
2nd
George A. Christensen
Public Member
Kent County
2/26/11
2nd
Jennifer Xenakes
Hearing Aid Dispenser
New Castle County
03/23/09
1st
Carol A. Guilbert
Public Member
Sussex County
11/07/10
2nd
Cynthia Parker
Hearing Aid Dispenser
Sussex County
1/3/09
2nd
Maisha Britt
Public Member
Kent County
4/18/11
1st

The Governor’s Office recently filled the vacant hearing aid dispenser member in October 2008, which was vacant since September 2007. The Governor’s Office has found it difficult to fill this professional member designation due to the limited number of licensed hearing aid dispensers. Also, there is currently a hearing aid dispenser member who is “holding over” until a replacement can be found (term expired 1/3/09). Proposed Changes to Draft JSC Report for Board of Speech/Language Pathologists, Audiologists,
and Hearing Aid Dispensers, pg. 2

The Board is proposing to change the composition of the nine-member Board to more accurately reflect the licensee population of which the majority of licensees are speech/language pathologists. The Board is suggesting an increase in the number of speech/pathology members from two to four; maintaining the audiology members at two; decreasing the number of hearing aid dispensers from two to one and reducing the public members from three to two. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 6

One point to consider regarding the Board’s suggested change to the Board composition would be to consider increasing the number of speech/language pathologists to 3 not 4, as suggested by the Board and reduce the number of hearing aid dispensers to one. Therefore the number of speech/language pathologists and the number of public members would be an odd number.

Board Member Training and Compensation
Pursuant to statute, the Division provides an orientation and annual training for Board members. This training outlines the legal responsibilities of Board members to protect the health, safety and welfare of the general public. Attendance at this training is mandatory. Members are also provided with a resource manual. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 19

As is standard practice with other Boards, members are compensated for Board meeting attendance at a rate of $50 per meeting, but not more than $500 in any calendar year. Members are also reimbursed for mileage at the State’s reimbursement rate. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg 19

Removal of a Board Member
Board members can be suspended or removed from a Board by the Governor for misfeasance, nonfeasance, malfeasance, misconduct, incompetency or neglect of duty. Neglect of duty is defined as absences without adequate reason for 3 consecutive meetings or when a member fails to attend at least half of all regular business meetings during any calendar year. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 19 When a Board member’s attendance becomes a concern, the Director of the Division of Professional Regulation sends a letter to the member. To date, no Board members have been removed under these provisions.

Meetings
Statute mandates that the Board hold regularly scheduled business meetings at least once in each quarter of a calendar year and at such times as the President deems necessary or at the request of a majority of the Board members. 24 Del. C. §3704 A review of the meeting minutes of the past three years indicate that the Board met its statutory requirement for holding meetings. Meetings were well attended by members and the DAG.

A majority of the members shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of transacting business, and no disciplinary action shall be taken without the affirmative vote of at least 5 members. 24 Del. C. §3704

Staff
Prior to November 2007, one administrative staff person (merit system employee) was assigned to provide all services to the Board, other than investigations. Subsequently, a Service Team of 5 members (all merit system employees) provide administrative support to the Board. This support includes credentialing, licensee and board liaison services. The Division has an Investigative Unit that assigns investigators to assist the Board in handling complaints filed against licensees. The Service Team also provides administrative services to eleven other professional boards and commissions and the Investigative Unit handles complaints for all professional boards and commissions. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 19

Staff is hired through the State of Delaware Merit System competitive hiring process, which is coordinated through the Department of State’s Human Resources Office and the Office of Management and Budget, Human Resources Office. Specifically, there is statewide recruitment, the Office of Management and Budget evaluates applicants to determine if they meet minimum qualifications, prepares the certification list of eligible persons and interviews are conducted by the Division of Professional Regulation. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pgs. 20-21

Staff Responsibilities
The Commission provided the following chart regarding staff responsibilities: JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 21

Credentialing Services
Administrative Specialist II)
Board Liaison Services (2)
Administrative Specialist II
Licensee Services
Administrative Specialist II
    Review applications
    Complete licensing system checklist and coordinate with board services
    Issue licenses
    Respond to customer inquiries-Level 2
    Issue temporary permits
    Coordinate testing and applicant results
    Website updates
    Maintain licensing database.
Attend/schedule/notice meetings & hearings
Prepare board agenda and minutes
Process board member payments
Monitor formal complaints (from DAG)
Manage all board correspondence
Website updates
Conduct research/ legislative initiatives.
Respond to customer inquiries – Level 2
Maintain licensing database.
    Issue licenses and temporary permits
    Complete license verifications
    Review paper renewals
    Release renewal holds
    Respond to customer inquiries – Level 2
    Update website
    Maintain licensing database

Based on the new Service Team structure, the above reflects the tasks that each staff member performs in each work category for twelve professions. Each profession within the service team was assigned an overall workload rating. Based on the workload rating of the Board of Speech/Language Pathologists, Audiologists and Hearing Aid Dispensers, 8-10% of each staff’s time is spent providing the above administrative activities to the Board. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 21

Training
Both the Department of State Human Resources Office and the Division of Professional Regulation conduct orientations with all new employees. Training opportunities for staff are available through in-house training, offerings by the Office of Management & Budget, Human Resources Management, national conferences and committees, education reimbursement for higher education as well as participation in the State’s Supervisory Development and Career Enrichment Programs. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 21

Licensing
The Board issues licenses for speech/language pathologists, audiologists and hearing aid dispensers. Permanent licenses are valid for two years. The biennial renewal period begins August 1st through July 31st in odd years. A person may be licensed in more than 1 specialty as long as the person meets the requirements of each specialty.

The minutes from October 8, 2008 Board meeting reflect that there has been some discussion among the Board members regarding the possibility of issuing a combined license for audiologists who also dispense hearing aids.

Temporary Licensure
Temporary licenses are valid for one year, but can be renewed for an additional 1 year in extenuating circumstances as determined by the Board. 24 Del. C. § 3713

The Board indicated that §3713(b), which addresses the issuance of a temporary license, should state that an audiologist does not need to be supervised during the period of temporary licensure. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 6

License Renewal
Licenses expire biennially and may be renewed with the payment of the fee and evidence of continuing education courses. Applicants must complete 20 hours of continuing education every two years, as set out in Rules and Regulations. If an individual is renewing a triple license, he/she must complete 30 hours of continuing education that includes 10 hours of continuing education in each specialty.

A licensee may apply to the Board for inactive status for up to five years. The license may be reactivated upon application and proof of continuing education completed within 24 months and payment of the fee. 24 Del. C. § 3712(d)

Fees
The following fees are in effect for FY’09:

License Type
Fee
Audiologist
$97
Hearing Aid Dispenser
$97
Speech/Language Pathologist
$97
Temporary (All Types)
$65

Reciprocity
With regard to reciprocity, the Board is empowered to license an applicant who:
1) is currently licensed, and in good standing, in another state, the District of Columbia or territory of the United States whose standards for licensure are substantially similar to Delaware’s standards; and
2) holds a current certificate of clinical competence from the American Speech/Language and Hearing Association in the area in which the applicant is applying for licensure; and
3) meets the conditions for licensure set forth in statute pertaining to administrative penalties, drug and alcohol impairment and criminal history. 24 Del. C. § 3710

For Speech and Audiology, the following states have similar standards equivalent to Delaware: Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, Hawaii, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas, Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

For Hearing Aid Dispensers, the State of Maryland has been determined substantially similar to Delaware. Delaware receives very few reciprocity applications, as such the Board reviews them on a case by case basis.

The Board has indicated that the reciprocity provision in §3710(a) needs to be amended to clarify that an applicant would need to meet the requirements in both (a)(1) and (a)(2). JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 6

Licensure for Speech/Language Pathologists and Audiologists
There are currently 422 active licensed speech/language pathologists and 18 with a temporary license. There are currently 63 active licensed audiologists.

Applicants applying for licensure as a speech/language pathologist or audiologist must meet the national requirements for certification of clinical competence issued by the American Speech/Language and Hearing Association (ASHA). These requirements include: 24 Del. C. § 3708

a. Possession of a master's degree or its equivalent from an accredited college or university, with major emphasis in speech/language pathology, audiology, communication disorders or speech/language and hearing science.
b. Complete a supervised clinical practicum of 375 hours. (prescribed in Regulation)
c. Completion of 9-months' full-time or 18-months' part-time supervised Clinical Fellowship year, begun after fulfilling academic and clinical practicum requirements.
d. Successful completion of a national examination in the area of applicant's specialty prepared by a national testing service and approved by the Division.

There are also other conditions for licensure regarding conduct, drug and alcohol impairment, criminal conviction or charges and intentionally providing fraudulent information. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pgs. 24-25

Currently statute requires a degree with “major emphasis” in speech/language pathology, communication disorders or speech/language and hearing science. 24 Del. C. § 3708(a)(1) AHSA specifies a minimum of 75 hours in a course of study addressing knowledge and skills pertinent to the field of speech/language pathology. The Board has suggested that this provision be addressed in rules and regulation issues as opposed to statutory language.

The Board’s Deputy Attorney General did a comparison of the current ASHA standards with those specified in the Board’s Rules and Regulations, and some revisions are necessary. For example, statute references a clinical practicum in accordance with Board Rules. 24 Del. C. § 3708(a)(1)b Rule 2.2.1 mentions 375 clock hours. ASHA now requires 400 clock hours. The Board has suggested that these provisions remain as rules and regulation issues, as opposed to statutory language.

The Board is proposing that the licensure requirements for audiologists be changed from a master’s degree and completion of a supervised clinical practicum and supervised clinical fellowship to completion of a doctoral degree. The purpose of this change is that educational institutions are no longer offering master’s degree programs in audiology. The doctoral programs encompass the practicum and fellowship requirements. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 6 The Board is proposing that these changes become effective two years after the date of enactment or through August 31, 2011 which is the end of the licensure renewal period. Proposed Changes to Draft JSC Report for Board of Speech/Language Pathologists, Audiologists,
and Hearing Aid Dispensers, pg. 2

Examination
The Praxis Exam for Speech/Language Pathologist and Audiology is a written, national exam developed by the American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA). The test is offered 6-7 times a year and is administered by Education Testing Services (ETS). Delaware testing sites are located in Dover, Georgetown and Newark. The exams are scored by ETS and the scores are sent to the Division of Professional Regulation within 4 weeks of the exam date. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 31

Data for licensure as a Speech/Language Pathologist: JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 30


# of License
Applications
Received
# of Licenses
Issued
# of License Applications
Rejected
(Denied)
# of Licenses
Suspended
# of Licenses Revoked
Calendar Year 2007
51
55-permanent
13-temp.
0
0
0
Calendar Year 2006
51
46-permanent
20-temp.
0
0
0
Calendar Year 2005
40
38-permanent
12-temp.
0
0
0
Applications are often pending for a period of time. To that end, there is no correlation between the date of application and the date the license is issued.

Data for licensure as an Audiologist: JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 30

# of License
Applications
Received
# of Licenses
Issued
# of License
Applications Rejected (Denied)
# of Licenses
Suspended
# of Licenses Revoked
Calendar Year 2007
12
9-permanent
1-temp
0
0
0
Calendar Year 2006
3
5-permanent
0-temp
0
0
0
Calendar Year 2005
5
5-permanent
1-temp
0
0
0
Applications are often pending for a period of time. To that end, there is no correlation between the date of application and the date the license is issued.

Exemptions
Statute does not prevent:
Any person from performing industrial hearing screenings under the supervision of a physician licensed in this State.
Any person who is not licensed under this chapter from engaging in the practice of speech/language pathology or audiology in this State, provided that such services are practiced in cooperation with a person licensed under this chapter and shall be practiced for no more than 30 days in any calendar year. The speech/language pathologist or audiologist shall meet the qualifications and requirements for application for licensure described in this chapter, or shall hold a valid license from another state which has requirements equivalent to this chapter, or shall hold a certificate of clinical competence in speech/language pathology or audiology issued by the American Speech, Language and Hearing Association.
Any person who is licensed to practice speech/language pathology, audiology or dispense hearing aids in any other state, district or foreign country who, as a practicing speech/language pathologist, audiologist or hearing aid dispenser, from entering this State to consult with a licensed speech/language pathologist, audiologist or hearing aid dispenser of this State. Such consultation shall be limited to examination, recommendation and testimony in litigation.
Any student of an accredited school or college of speech/language pathology or audiology from receiving practical training under the personal supervision of a licensed speech/language pathologist or audiologist in this State

Statute does not provide a specific exemption for physicians, except for the hearing screening issue.

Licensure – Hearing Aid Dispenser
There are currently 77 active licensed Hearing Aid Dispensers and 9 with a temporary license. For licensure as a hearing aid dispenser, the applicant must submit evidence, verified by oath and satisfactory to the Board, that such person has met the current standards of the International Institute for Hearing Instrument Studies. In addition, the applicant shall:

a. Provide verification of a high school diploma or its equivalent.

b. Provide proof of successful completion of a national examination prepared by a national testing service and approved by the Division. The applicant shall complete 6 months of training prior to taking the examination. The Board in its rules and regulations shall establish the frequency of direct supervision during the training period. (Direct supervision means direct, on-site observations of the applicant by the supervisor. Applicants shall be under direct supervision for 100% of the time during the first 2 months, 50% of the time during the subsequent 2 months and 25% of the time during the final 2months of the training period. Rules and Regulation 3.1.2.2)

c. Provide notarized signature of Delaware-licensed hearing aid dispenser sponsor providing direct supervision and training of applicant.

d. Paragraphs (a) and (c) above do not apply to applicants who are licensed audiologists.


There are also other conditions for licensure regarding conduct, drug and alcohol impairment, criminal conviction or charges and intentionally providing fraudulent information

The statutory requirements 24 Del. C § 3708(a)(2) for a hearing aid dispenser need to clarify that an audiologist applicant does not need to meet the six months’ training requirement. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 6

Examination
The exam for Hearing Aid Dispensers is a written, national exam developed by the International Institute for Hearing Instrument Studies. The test is offered 4 times a year and is administered by Prometric. Delaware testing sites are located in Dover and Newark. The exams are scored by Protmetric and the scores are sent to the Division of Professional Regulation within 10 days of the exam date JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 31

Data for licensure as a hearing aid dispenser: JSC Initial Questionnaire, pgs. 30-31


# of License
Applications
Received
# of Licenses
Issued
# of License Applications
Rejected
(Denied)
# of Licenses
Suspended
# of Licenses Revoked
Calendar Year 2007
10
8-permanent
5-temp
0
0
0
Calendar Year 2006
7
6-permanent
9-temp
1
0
0
Calendar Year 2005
4
7-permanent
5-temp
0
0
0
Applications are often pending for a period of time. To that end, there is no correlation between the date of application and the date the license is issued.

Complaints
The Board provided the following with regard to complaints: JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 33

The Division investigates complaints from the public against licensed professionals and those practicing without a license. If it is determined that a complaint has merit and the facts are able to be substantiated, the investigation is either addressed through a Justice of the Peace Court (unlicensed activity) or forwarded to the Attorney’s General’s Office with a prosecution recommendation. Complaints that are unable to be substantiated or do not rise to the level of a violation of law or rule are closed at the division level. The [D]ivision [D]irector has authority to subpoena investigative material and witnesses. Investigations involve evidence gathering, witness interviews and rare undercover operations.

There are nine License Investigators who provide investigative support to 34 boards and commissions within the Division of Professional Regulation. The goal of the Investigative Unit is to complete each investigation within 90 days of receipt. In 99% of the cases, the Division meets that goal. On average, the time between receipt of a claim and conclusion is much less than 90 days.

Below is a flow chart showing the complaint process:


The following information was included in the response to the Initial Questionnaire: Revised Section 10, pg. 1

Of the eight complaints received for investigation during the past three calendar years, the nature of the complaints is as follows:

In 2005, 1 complaint challenged the decision of a speech pathologist’s plan of treatment for a student. This complaint was accepted, but determined after investigation that no actual violation occurred and the complaint was closed.

In 2006, 4 complaints were received, 2 of which were for defective hearing aids, and 2 were about the font size used in the disclaimer of a hearing aid advertisement. One complaint was not accepted by the Investigative Unit, two complaints (font size and defective hearing aid) were investigated and found that no violation occurred and the complaints were closed. One complaint was forwarded to the Attorney Generals Office and the Board imposed disciplinary action (2 fines of $500 and a written reprimand).

In 2007, there were 4 complaints of unlicensed activity or working on an expired license. Of the four complaints, one was closed after the investigative findings revealed there was no unlicensed activity during an expired license; three complaints were investigated and forwarded to the Attorney General’s Office. One of the three remaining complaints was dismissed by the Attorney General’s Office, one resulted in the licensee and the Board accepting a consent agreement for a letter of reprimand and one remains pending at the Attorney General’s Office.

The chart below provides the complaint data for calendar years 2005, 2006, and 2007: Revised Section 10, pg. 2

Calendar Year 2005
Calendar Year
2006
Calendar Year 2007
Total Number of Complaints Received by the Board of Speech/Language Pathologists, Audiologists, and Hearing Aid Dispensers
1
4
(1 not accepted)
4
Total Number of Complaints Investigated
1
(closed after investigation)
3
(2 closed after investigation)
4
(1 closed after investigation)
Total Number of Complaints found to be Valid
0
1
3
Total Number of Complaints Forwarded to the Attorney General’s Office
0
1
3
1 -Dismissed by AG’s Office
2- Pending by AG’s Office
Total Number of Complaints Resulting in Disciplinary Action
0
1
(2 fines of $500 and letter of reprimand)
0

Disciplinary Action
Hearings and Appeals
All hearings shall be informal without use of rules of evidence. If the Board finds, by a majority vote of all members, that the complaint has merit, the Board shall take such action as it deems necessary. The Board's decision shall be in writing and shall include its reasons for such decision.

When the practitioner is in disagreement with the action of the Board, the practitioner may appeal the Board's decision to the Superior Court. The Court shall hear the evidence on the record. 24 Del. C. § 3717

Grounds for discipline
A license may be revoked after due notice and a hearing. Grounds for discipline include: 24 Del. C. § 3715 and § 3716

· Procuring a license or attempting to procure a license by fraud or intentional misrepresentation.

Has illegally, incompetently or negligently practiced speech/language pathology, audiology or hearing aid dispensing.

Has engaged in an act of consumer fraud or deception; engaged in the restraint of competition; or participated in price-fixing activities.

Has excessively used or abused drugs either in the past 2 years or currently.

· Has been convicted of a crime that is substantially related to the practice of speech/language pathology, audiology and/or the dispensing of hearing aids

· Has a physical condition such that the performance of speech/language pathology, audiology or dispensing of hearing aids is or may be injurious or prejudicial to the public.

The practitioner's license has been suspended or revoked, or other disciplinary action has been taken in another jurisdiction; provided, however, the Board has determined that the facts found in the other jurisdiction constitute 1 or more of the grounds defined in Delaware statute.

· Failure to notify the Board that the practitioner's license had been suspended or revoked, or other disciplinary action had been taken in another jurisdiction

Disciplinary Action by the Board
After the Board hears evidence and deliberates in public hearing, they can impose the following sanctions: 24 Del. C. §3716

Issue a letter of reprimand

Censure a practitioner.

Place a practitioner on probationary status, and require the practitioner to:

Report regularly to the Board upon the matters that are the basis of the probation.

Limit all practice and professional activities to those areas prescribed by the Board.

Suspend any practitioner's license.

Revoke any practitioner's license.

Impose a monetary penalty not to exceed $500 for each violation.

The Board may withdraw or reduce conditions of probation when it finds that the deficiencies that required such action have been remedied.

Where a license has been suspended due to a disability of the licensee, the Board may reinstate such license if, after a hearing, the Board is satisfied that the licensee is able to practice with reasonable skill and safety.

As a condition to the reinstatement of a suspended license, or removal from probationary status, the Board may impose such disciplinary or corrective measures as are authorized by statute.


Disciplinary Action by the Justice of the Peace Court
Currently statute authorizes the Justice of the Peace Court to have jurisdiction over unlicensed practice by a person not currently licensed as a speech/language pathologist, audiologist or dispenser of hearing aids. 24 Del. C. § 3720 HB 36 in the 144th General Assembly provided Boards with the cease and desist authority with regard to the unauthorized practice of the regulated profession, as well as authorizing the Board to establish and impose administrative fines against a person who violates such cease and desist orders.

Reinstatement of a suspended license; removal from probationary status; replacement of license. 24 Del. C. § 3718
As a condition to reinstatement of a suspended license, or removal from probationary status, the Board may reinstate such license if, after a hearing, the Board is satisfied that the licensee has taken the prescribed corrective actions and otherwise satisfied all of the conditions of the suspension and/or the probation.

When a license or registration has been suspended due to the licensee's inability to practice, the Board may reinstate such license if after a hearing, the Board is satisfied that the licensee is again able to perform the essential functions of a speech pathologist, audiologist or hearing aid dispenser, with or without reasonable accommodations, and that there is no longer a significant risk of substantial harm to the health and safety of the individual or others.

Applicants for reinstatement must pay the appropriate fees and submit the documentation required by the Board as evidence that all the conditions of a suspension and/or probation have been met. Proof that the applicant has met the continuing education requirements may also be required, as appropriate.

A new license to replace any license lost, destroyed or mutilated may be issued subject to the rules of the Board. A charge set by the Division shall be made for such issuance.

Public Information
The Board has a web presence on the Division of Professional Regulation’s website at www.dpr.delaware.gov . This site provides laws, rules and regulations, frequency asked questions, licensure and renewal requirements. The public can search for licensees at a “Verify License Online” link to determine the licensure status and whether the licensee has public disciplinary action. Information is available to the public about the complaint process and a complaint form can be downloaded.

Rule and regulation changes and hearings are noticed in the media and through the Register of Regulation pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act. The Board stated it held numerous workshops to discuss proposed changes to its statute and rules and regulations. Board meeting agendas and minutes are available online. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 16

Below is a chart showing groups that are affected by the Board’s actions or groups that represent others served by or affected by the Board.

Group or Association Name/Contact Person
Phone Number/ Internet Address
Delaware Speech-Language-Hearing Association (DSHA)
Shelly Davidson, President
Hearing Loss Association of Delaware (HLADE)
Linda Heller, State Coordinator,


Below is a chart showing national organizations or other government entities that serve as an information clearinghouse or regularly interact with the Board.

Group or Association Name/Contact Person
Phone Number/ Internet Address
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)301-296-5700
www.asha.org
International Institute for Hearing Instrument Studies (IIHIS)734-522-7200 or 800-521-5247
http://ihsinfo.org
American Academy of Audiologyhttp://www.audiology.org/
800-AAA-2336, 703-790-8466 |

Fiscal
The Division of Professional Regulation, in coordination with the Department of State, performs a fee setting analysis biennially. This analysis was just completed in May 2008 for fees effective July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2010. The new renewal fee is $97 for all license types and $65 for temporary licenses. The Division is implementing flat fees beginning this biennial period. JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 23

The chart below shows the revenue collected for the fiscal years indicated: JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 22

Source(s) of Funds
Amount
FY’09 (budgeted)*Special Funds
FY’08 (actual)Special Funds$25,995.00
FY’07 (actual)Special Funds$28,793.00
*Licenses expire 7/31 of odd years. Renewal revenue is counted when applied, therefore renewal revenue is split between fiscal years. To that end, we are unable to estimate FY 09 since the number of licensees who will renew is unknown. We are also unable to determine how many people will apply for licensure.

The chart below shows a breakdown of the fees collected for FY’08: JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 22

Description of Fee
Current Fee $$
Number of Persons or Entities Paying Fee
Fee Revenue
$$
Where the Fee Revenue is Deposited (i.e., general fund, special fund)
Renewal$ 91.00
173
$ 15,743.00Special Fund
Licensure*Pro-rated
118
$ 7,602.00Special Fund
Late Fee$ 46.00
30
$ 1,380.00Special Fund
License Verification$ 15.00
56
$ 840.00Special Fund
Detailed Verification$ 25.00
1
$ 25.00Special Fund
Roster Fee$ 30.00
11
$ 330.00Special Fund
Duplicate License$ 15.00
5
$ 75.00Special Fund
* The above licensure data reflects the time period 7/1/07 – 6/30/08. Licensure fees were prorated based on the postmarked date.

The chart below shows the total expenditures by fiscal year: JSC Initial Questionnaire, pg. 23
Fiscal Year
Source(s)
Amount $$
FY’09 (budgeted*)Special Fund
FY’08 (actual)Special Fund$ 30,926
FY’07 (actual)Special Fund$ 31,600
* Unable to provide expenditure information on a per board/commission basis. The budget for Division of Professional Regulation encompasses all boards/commissions.






APPENDIX A
TITLE 24
Professions and Occupations
CHAPTER 37. SPEECH/LANGUAGE PATHOLOGISTS, AUDIOLOGISTS, AND HEARING AID DISPENSERS
Subchapter I. Board of Speech/Language Pathologists, Audiologists and Hearing Aid Dispensers

§ 3701. Objectives.
The primary objective of the Board of Speech/Language Pathologists, Audiologists and Hearing Aid Dispensers, to which all other objectives and purposes are secondary, is to protect the general public, specifically those persons who are the direct recipients of services regulated by this chapter, from unsafe practices and from occupational practices which tend to reduce competition or fix the price of services rendered.
The secondary objectives of the Board are to maintain minimum standards of practitioner competency and to maintain certain standards in the delivery of services to the public. In meeting its objectives, the Board shall develop standards assuring professional competence; shall monitor complaints brought against practitioners regulated by the Board; shall adjudicate at formal hearings; shall promulgate rules and regulations; and shall impose sanctions where necessary against licensed practitioners. (24 Del. C. 1953, § 3601; 59 Del. Laws, c. 206, § 1; 63 Del. Laws, c. 151, § 2; 65 Del. Laws, c. 224, § 1; 72 Del. Laws, c. 266, § 1.)
§ 3702. Definitions.
The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them under this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:
(1) "Audiologist" shall mean a person who is licensed to practice audiology pursuant to this act and who offers such services to the public under any title or description of services incorporating the words "audiologist," "hearing clinician," "hearing therapist," "aural rehabilitator" or any other similar title or description of service.
(2) "Audiology aide" shall mean a person who is certified by the Council of Accreditation of Occupational Hearing Conservationists, or its equivalent, and whose supervising licensed audiologist annually shall register such person with the Board. The audiology aide shall perform services only under the direct supervision of an audiologist licensed in this State.
(3) "Board" shall mean the State Board of Speech/Language Pathologists, Audiologists and Hearing Aid Dispensers established in this chapter.
(4) "Division" shall mean the state Division of Professional Regulation.
(5) "Excessive use or abuse of drugs" shall mean any use of narcotics, controlled substances or illegal drugs without a prescription from a licensed physician, or the abuse of alcoholic beverage such that it impairs an individual's ability to perform the work of a speech/language pathologist, audiologist or hearing aid dispenser.
(6) "Hearing aid" shall mean any personal, wearable instrument or device designed for, offered for the purpose of, or represented as, aiding persons with, or compensating for, impaired hearing.
(7) "Hearing aid dispenser" shall mean a person licensed to dispense hearing aids pursuant to this Act and who is engaged in the evaluation or measurement of the power or range of human hearing by means of an audiometer or any other means devised for the purpose of selecting, adapting and distributing or selling of hearing aids. Testing shall not include medical diagnosis or audiologic evaluation. Licensed hearing aid dispensers may provide instruction, orientation and counseling on the use and operation of a hearing aid; and they may use an otoscope or "ear light" to evaluate the feasibility and use of ear molds and ear mold impressions.
(8) "Person" shall mean a corporation, company, association or partnership, as well as an individual. Licenses shall be issued only to individuals under this chapter.
(9) "Practice of audiology" shall mean the application of principles, methods and procedures of measurement, testing, evaluation, prediction, consultation, counseling, instruction, habilitation and rehabilitation related to hearing and disorders of hearing for the purpose of evaluating, identifying, preventing, ameliorating or modifying such disorders and conditions in individuals and/or groups. For the purpose of this subsection, the terms "habilitation" and "rehabilitation" shall include, but are not limited to, hearing aid evaluation, recommendation, and fitting.
(10) "Practice of speech/language pathology" shall mean the application of principles, methods and procedures for measurement, testing, evaluation, prediction, counseling, instruction, habilitation or rehabilitation related to the development and disorders of speech, language, voice, rate or rhythm for the purpose of evaluating, preventing, ameliorating or modifying such disorders in individuals and/or groups.
(11) "Speech/language pathologist" shall mean a person who is licensed to practice speech/language pathology pursuant to this act and who offers such services to the public under any title or description of services incorporating the words "speech/language pathologist," "speech pathologist," "language pathologist," "speech and/or language therapist," "speech and/or language correctionist," "speech and/or language clinician," "voice therapist," "communicologist," "aphasiologist" or any other similar title or description of service.
(12) "Speech pathology aide" shall mean a person, who meets minimum qualifications that the Board may establish, which permit such an aide to assist speech/language pathologists in their professional endeavors, but only while under the direct supervision of a licensed speech/language pathologist.
(13) "State" shall mean the State of Delaware.
(14) "Substantially related" means the nature of the criminal conduct, for which the person was convicted, has a direct bearing on the fitness or ability to perform 1 or more of the duties or responsibilities necessarily related to the practice of speech/language pathology, audiology and/or the dispensing of hearing aids. (24 Del. C. 1953, § 3603; 59 Del. Laws, c. 206, § 1; 63 Del. Laws, c. 151, § 4; 65 Del. Laws, c. 224, § 1; 72 Del. Laws, c. 266, § 1; 74 Del. Laws, c. 262, § 80.)
§ 3703. Board of Speech/Language Pathologists, Audiologists, and Hearing Aid Dispensers; appointments; composition; qualifications; term; vacancies; suspension or removal; unexcused absences; compensation.
(a) There is created a State Board of Speech/Language Pathologists, Audiologists, and Hearing Aid Dispensers, which shall administer and enforce this chapter.
(b) The Board shall consist of 9 members, appointed by the Governor, who are residents of this State: 2 shall be speech/language pathologists licensed under this chapter; 2 shall be audiologists licensed under this chapter; 2 shall be hearing aid dispensers licensed under this chapter, and 3 public members. Each professional member of the Board shall be a primary practitioner of that member's specialty. The public members shall not be, nor ever have been, speech/language pathologists, audiologists or hearing aid dispensers; nor members of the immediate family of a speech/language pathologist, audiologist or hearing aid dispenser; shall not have been employed by a speech/language pathologist, audiologist or hearing aid dispenser, or a company engaged in the practice of speech/language pathology, audiology or dispensing hearing aids; shall not have a material interest in the providing of goods and services to speech/language pathologists, audiologists or hearing aid dispensers; nor have been engaged in an activity directly related to speech/language pathology, audiology or dispensing hearing aids. The public members shall be accessible to inquiries, comments and suggestions from the general public.
(c) Except as provided in subsection (d) of this section, each member shall serve a term of 3 years, and may succeed himself or herself for 1 additional term; provided, however, that where a member was initially appointed to fill a vacancy, such member may succeed himself or herself for only 1 additional full term. Any person appointed to fill a vacancy on the Board shall hold office for the remainder of the unexpired term of the former member. Each term of office shall expire on the date specified in the appointment; however, the Board member shall remain eligible to participate in Board proceedings unless or until replaced by the Governor. Persons who are members of the Board on February 4, 2000, shall complete their terms.
(d) A person who has never served on the Board may be appointed to the Board for 2 consecutive terms; but no such person shall thereafter be eligible for 2 consecutive appointments. No person who has been twice appointed to the Board or who has served on the Board for 6 years within any 9-year period shall again be appointed to the Board until an interim period of at least 1 term has expired since such person last served.
(e) Any act or vote by a person appointed in violation of this section shall be invalid. An amendment or revision of this chapter is not sufficient cause for any appointment or attempted appointment in violation of subsection (d) of this section unless such an amendment or revision amends this section to permit such an appointment.
(f) A member of the Board shall be suspended or removed by the Governor for misfeasance, nonfeasance, malfeasance, misconduct, incompetency or neglect of duty. A member subject to disciplinary hearing shall be disqualified from Board business until the charge is adjudicated or the matter is otherwise concluded. A Board member may appeal any suspension or removal to the Superior Court.
(g) No member of the Board, while serving on the Board, shall hold elective office in any professional association of speech/language pathologists, audiologists or hearing aid dispensers; this includes a prohibition against serving as head of a professional association's Political Action Committee (PAC).
(h) The provisions set forth in Chapter 58 of Title 29 shall apply to all members of the Board.
(i) Any member who is absent without adequate reason for 3 consecutive meetings or fails to attend at least half of all regular business meetings during any calendar year shall be guilty of neglect of duty.
(j) Each member of the Board shall be reimbursed for all expenses involved in each meeting, including travel according to Division policy; and in addition shall receive not more than $50 for each meeting attended, but not more than $500 in any calendar year. After 10 meetings have been attended, the member shall not be compensated for any subsequent meetings attended in that year. (24 Del. C. 1953, § 3607; 59 Del. Laws, c. 206, § 1; 63 Del. Laws, c. 151, § 8; 65 Del. Laws, c. 224, § 1; 67 Del. Laws, c. 368, § 24; 70 Del. Laws, c. 186, § 1; 72 Del. Laws, c. 266, § 1.)
§ 3704. Organization; meetings; officers; quorum.
(a) The Board shall hold regularly scheduled business meetings at least once in each quarter of a calendar year and at such times as the President deems necessary or at the request of a majority of the Board members.
(b) The Board annually shall elect a President and Secretary. Each officer shall serve for 1 year, and shall not succeed himself or herself for more than 2 consecutive terms.
(c) A majority of the members shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of transacting business, and no disciplinary action shall be taken without the affirmative vote of at least 5 members.
(d) Minutes of all meetings shall be recorded, and the Division of Professional Regulation shall maintain copies. At any hearing where evidence is presented, a record from which a verbatim transcript can be prepared shall be made. The person requesting it shall incur the expense of preparing any transcript. (24 Del. C. 1953, § 3607; 59 Del. Laws, c. 206, § 1; 63 Del. Laws, c. 151, § 8; 65 Del. Laws, c. 224, § 1; 67 Del. Laws, c. 368, § 24; 70 Del. Laws, c. 186, § 1; 72 Del. Laws, c. 266, § 1.)
§ 3705. Records.
The Division shall keep a register of all approved applications for license as a speech/language pathologist, audiologist and hearing aid dispenser, and complete records relating to meetings of the Board, examinations, rosters, changes and additions to the Board's rules and regulations, complaints, hearings and such other matters as the Board shall determine. Such records shall be prima facie evidence of the proceedings of the Board. (72 Del. Laws, c. 266, § 1.)
§ 3706. Powers and duties; immunity.
(a) The Board of Speech/Language Pathologists, Audiologists and Hearing Aid Dispensers shall have authority to:
(1) Formulate rules and regulations, with appropriate notice to those affected; all rules and regulations shall be promulgated in accordance with the procedures specified in the Administrative Procedures Act [Chapter 101 of Title 29] of this State. Each rule or regulation shall implement or clarify a specific section of this chapter.
(2) Designate the application form to be used by all applicants and to process all applications.
(3) Designate the national, written, standardized examinations in speech/language pathology, audiology and hearing aid dispensing, prepared by a national testing service(s), to be taken by all persons applying for licensure as speech/language pathologists, audiologists and/or hearing aid dispensers; applicants who qualify for licensure by reciprocity shall have achieved a passing score on all parts of the designated written national examination in the applicant's specialty.
(4) Evaluate the credentials of all persons applying for a license to practice speech/language pathology, audiology or to dispense hearing aids in this State or to act as audiology aides or speech pathology aides, in order to determine whether such persons meet the qualifications set forth in this chapter.
(5) Grant licenses to, and renew licenses of all persons who meet the qualifications for licensure, including those persons who apply for temporary licensure.
(6) Establish by rule and regulation continuing education standards required for license renewal.
(7) Evaluate certified records to determine whether an applicant for licensure who previously has been licensed, certified or registered in another jurisdiction to practice speech/language pathology, audiology and dispense hearing aids has engaged in any act or offense that would be grounds for disciplinary action under this chapter and whether there are disciplinary proceedings or unresolved complaints pending against such applicant for such acts or offenses.
(8) Refer all complaints from licensees and the public concerning persons licensed in this chapter or concerning practices of the Board or of the profession, to the Division for investigation pursuant to § 8735 of Title 29 and assign a member of the Board to assist the Division in an advisory capacity with the investigation of the technical aspects of the complaint.
(9) Conduct hearings and issue orders in accordance with procedures established pursuant to Chapter 101 of Title 29.
(10) Where it has been determined after a hearing that penalties or sanctions should be imposed, to designate and impose the appropriate sanction or penalty after time for appeal has lapsed.
(11) Adopt and publish a code of ethics for each professional specialty and promulgate within 60 days of adoption.
(12) Establish and publish standards for electronic equipment used for the purpose of measuring hearing, and require written proof of calibration for such equipment annually.
(b) No member shall participate in any action of the Board involving directly or indirectly any person related in any way by blood or marriage to said member.
(c) The Board shall promulgate regulations specifically identifying those crimes which are substantially related to the practice of speech/language pathology, audiology and/or the dispensing of hearing aids. (24 Del. C. 1953, § 3608; 59 Del. Laws, c. 206, § 1; 65 Del. Laws, c. 224, § 1; 72 Del. Laws, c. 266, § 1; 74 Del. Laws, c. 262, § 81.)
Subchapter II. License
§ 3707. License required.
(a) No person shall engage in the practice of speech/language pathology, audiology or dispense hearing aids or hold himself or herself out to the public in this State as being qualified to practice the same; or use in connection with that person's name, or otherwise assume or use, any title or description conveying or tending to convey the impression that the person is qualified to practice speech/language pathology, audiology or dispense hearing aids, unless such person has been duly licensed under this chapter.
(b) Whenever a license to practice as a speech/language pathologist, audiologist hearing aid dispenser in this State has expired or been suspended or revoked, it shall be unlawful for the person to practice speech/language pathology, audiology or dispense hearing aids in this State.
(c) The Board may issue separate licenses in speech/language pathology, audiology and for hearing aid dispensers. A person may be licensed in more than 1 specialty if such person meets the requirements of each specialty for which the person has applied for licensure. (24 Del. C. 1953, § 3603; 59 Del. Laws, c. 206, § 1; 63 Del. Laws, c. 151, § 4; 65 Del. Laws, c. 224, § 1; 70 Del. Laws, c. 186, § 1; 72 Del. Laws, c. 266, § 1.)
§ 3708. Qualifications of applicant; report to Attorney General; judicial review.
(a) An applicant who is applying for licensure under this chapter shall submit evidence, verified by oath and satisfactory to the Board, that such person:
(1) For licensure as a speech/language pathologist or audiologist, has met the national requirements for certification of clinical competence issued by the American Speech/Language and Hearing Association (ASHA); the requirements include:
a. Possession of a master's degree or its equivalent from an accredited college or university, with major emphasis in speech/language pathology, audiology, communication disorders or speech/language and hearing science.
b. A supervised clinical practicum in accordance with the Board's rules and regulations.
c. Completion of 9-months' full-time or 18-months' part-time supervised clinical fellowship year, begun after fulfilling academic and clinical practicum requirements.
d. Successful completion of a national examination in the area of applicant's specialty prepared by a national testing service and approved by the Division.
(2) For licensure as a hearing aid dispenser, shall submit evidence, verified by oath and satisfactory to the Board, that such person has met the current standards promulgated by the National Institute for Hearing Instrument Studies or its successor; in addition, the applicant shall:
a. Provide verification of a high school diploma or its equivalent.
b. Provide proof of successful completion of a national examination prepared by a national testing service and approved by the Division. An applicant shall complete 6 months of training prior to taking the examination. The Board in its rules and regulations shall establish the frequency of direct supervision during the training period.
c. Provide notarized signature of Delaware-licensed hearing aid dispenser sponsor providing direct supervision and training of applicant.
d. Paragraphs (a)(2)a. and c. of this section herein shall not apply to applicants who are licensed audiologists.
(b) All applicants shall meet the following conditions:
(1) Shall not have been the recipient of any administrative penalties regarding their practice of speech/language pathology, audiology or dispensing of hearing aids, including but not limited to fines, formal reprimands, license suspensions or revocation (except for license revocations for nonpayment of license renewal fees), probationary limitations, and/or has not entered into any "consent agreements" which contain conditions placed by a Board on that applicant's professional conduct and practice, including any voluntary surrender of a license. The Board, after a hearing, may determine whether such administrative penalty is grounds to deny licensure.
(2) Shall not have any impairment related to drugs, alcohol or a finding of mental incompetence by a physician that would limit the applicant's ability to undertake that applicant's practice in a manner consistent with the safety of the public.
(3) [Deleted.]
(4) Shall not have a criminal conviction record, nor pending criminal charge relating to an offense the circumstances of which substantially relate to their licensed practice. Applicants who have criminal conviction records or pending criminal charges shall request appropriate authorities to provide information about the conviction or charge directly to the Board in sufficient specificity to enable the Board to make a determination whether the conviction or charge is substantially related to the applicant's area of practice. However, after a hearing, the Board, by an affirmative vote of a majority of the quorum, may waive this paragraph (b)(4) of this section, if it finds all of the following:
a. More than 5 years have elapsed since the applicant has fully discharged all imposed sentences. As used herein, the term "sentence" includes, but is not limited to, all periods of modification of a sentence, probation, parole or suspension. However, sentence does not include fines, restitution or community service, as long as the applicant is in substantial compliance with such fines, restitution and community service.
b. The applicant is capable of practicing speech/language pathology, audiology or the dispensing of hearing aids in a competent and professional manner.
c. The granting of the waiver will not endanger the public health, safety or welfare.
(c) Where the Board has found to its satisfaction that an applicant has been intentionally fraudulent or that false information has been intentionally supplied, it shall report its findings to the Attorney General for further action.
(d) Where the application of a person has been refused or rejected and such applicant feels that the Board has acted without justification, has imposed higher or different standards for that person than for other applicants or licensees, or has in some other manner contributed to or caused the failure of such application, the applicant may appeal to the Superior Court. (24 Del. C. 1953, § 3605; 59 Del. Laws, c. 206, § 1; 63 Del. Laws, c. 151, § 6; 65 Del. Laws, c. 224, § 1; 70 Del. Laws, c. 186, § 1; 72 Del. Laws, c. 266, § 1; 74 Del. Laws, c. 262, § 82; 75 Del. Laws, c. 359, §§ 1, 2; 75 Del. Laws, c. 436, § 42.)
§ 3709. Examination.
(a) In the event an applicant for licensure has not successfully completed the examinations required by this chapter, the Board shall administer or authorize the administration of such examinations described in § 3708(a)(1)d. and/or § 3708(a)(2)b. of this title. All examinations shall be graded by the testing service providing the examinations. The passing score for all examinations shall be established by the testing agency.
(b) The Board shall provide at least 2 dates annually for the administration of the examinations required by this section. The Board, with the approval of the Division, shall establish the time and place of the examinations.
(c) Persons who fail an examination required by this section may reapply for examination at the next possible date. Persons failing 2 examinations shall submit proof of additional education and/or training as may be required by the Board in the rules and regulations. Such persons may not be reexamined for a period of at least 1 year from the time of the second failure. (24 Del. C. 1953, § 3614; 59 Del. Laws, c. 206, § 1; 63 Del. Laws, c. 151, § 9; 65 Del. Laws, c. 224, § 1; 72 Del. Laws, c. 266, § 1.)
§ 3710. Reciprocity.
(a) Upon payment of the appropriate fee and submission and acceptance of a written application on forms provided by the Board, the Board shall grant a license to:
(1) An applicant who shall present proof of current licensure in "good standing" in another state, the District of Columbia, or territory of the United States whose standards for licensure are substantially similar to those of this State. A license in "good standing" is defined in § 3708(b)(1), (2), (3) [Deleted] and (4), of this title.
(2) An applicant who holds a current certificate of clinical competence from the American Speech/Language and Hearing Association in the area in which the applicant is applying for licensure and who, if licensed in another state or states, meets the requirements of § 3708(b)(1), (2), (3) [Deleted] and (4) of this title.
(b) An applicant who is licensed or registered in a state whose standards are not substantially similar to those of this State shall have practiced for a minimum of 5 years after licensure, provided, however, that the applicant meets all other qualifications for reciprocity in this section.
(c) An applicant for licensure as speech/language pathologist or audiologist who has received a master's degree or its equivalent from a foreign school, college or university shall submit a certified copy of that applicant's school, college or university record for evaluation.
(d) In the event that a disciplinary proceeding or unresolved complaint is pending, the applicant shall not be licensed in this State until the proceeding or complaint has been resolved. Applicants for licensure in this State shall be deemed to have given consent to the release of such information and to waive all objections to the admissibility of such information as evidence at any hearing or other proceeding to which the applicant may be subject.
(e) Each application for licensure shall be accompanied by payment of the application fee. (72 Del. Laws, c. 266, § 1; 70 Del. Laws, c. 186, § 1.)
§ 3711. Fees.
The amount to be charged for each fee imposed under this chapter shall approximate and reasonably reflect all costs necessary to defray the expenses of the Board, as well as the proportional expenses incurred by the Division in its service on behalf of the Board. There shall be a separate fee charged for each service or activity, but no fee shall be charged for a purpose not specified in this chapter. The application fee shall not be combined with any other fee or charge. At the beginning of each licensure biennium, the Division, or any other state agency acting in its behalf, shall compute, for each separate service or activity, the appropriate Board fees for the licensure biennium. (24 Del. C. 1953, § 3612; 59 Del. Laws, c. 206, § 1; 65 Del. Laws, c. 224, § 1; 65 Del. Laws, c. 380, § 6; 72 Del. Laws, c. 266, § 1.)
§ 3712. Issuance and renewal of licenses.
(a) The Board shall issue a license to each applicant who meets the requirements of this chapter for licensure as a speech/language pathologist, audiologist and/or hearing aid dispenser and who pays the fee established under § 3711 of this title.
(b) Each license shall be renewed biennially, in such manner as is determined by the Division, and upon payment of the appropriate fee and submission of a renewal form provided by the Division, and proof that the licensee has met the continuing education requirements established by the Board.
(c) The Board, in its rules and regulations, shall determine the period of time within which a licensee may still renew the licensee's license, notwithstanding the fact that such licensee has failed to renew on or before the renewal date, provided, however, that such period shall not exceed 1 year.
(d) A licensee, upon written request, may be placed in an inactive status for no more than 5 years. Such person, who desires to reactivate that person's license, shall complete a Board-approved application form, submit a renewal fee set by the Division, and submit proof of fulfillment of continuing education requirements in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Board. (24 Del. C. 1953, § 3617; 59 Del. Laws, c. 206, § 1; 65 Del. Laws, c. 224, § 1; 70 Del. Laws, c. 186. § 1; 72 Del. Laws, c. 266, § 1.)
§ 3713. Temporary license.
(a) The Board may issue a temporary license to practice speech/language pathology or audiology in this State to an applicant who completes the application and pays the temporary license fee; and who, in addition, has completed all academic and clinical practicum requirements in that applicant's specialty but who has not completed a clinical fellowship year (CFY). The notarized application shall be accompanied by a copy of the CFY plan signed by a sponsor holding a valid state license as a speech/language pathologist and/or audiologist.
(b) The Board may issue a temporary license to dispense hearing aids to an applicant waiting to take the examination for licensure who completes the application and pays the application fee. The notarized application shall be accompanied by a statement from a Delaware licensed audiologist or hearing aid dispenser who affirms that the licensed audiologist or hearing aid dispenser shall provide direct supervision and training of the applicant during the period of temporary licensure.
(c) The temporary license shall expire at the end of 1 year from issuance. The temporary license may be renewed once in accordance with the Board's rules and regulations. (65 Del. Laws, c. 224, § 1; 70 Del. Laws, c. 186. § 1; 72 Del. Laws, c. 266, § 1.)
§ 3714. Complaints.
(a) All complaints shall be received and investigated by the Division in accordance with § 8735, Title 29, and the Division shall be responsible for issuing a final written report at the conclusion of its investigation.
(b) When it is determined that an individual is engaging or has engaged in the practice of speech/language pathology, audiology or dispensing of hearing aids, or is using the title "speech/language pathologist," "audiologist," or "hearing aid dispenser" and is not licensed under the laws of this State, the Board shall apply to the Office of the Attorney General to issue a cease and desist order. (65 Del. Laws, c. 224, § 1; 65 Del. Laws, c. 355, § 1; 72 Del. Laws, c. 266, § 1.)
§ 3715. Grounds for discipline.
(a) A practitioner licensed under this chapter shall be subject to disciplinary actions set forth in § 3716 of this title if after a hearing, the Board finds that the speech/language pathologist, audiologist or hearing aid dispenser:
(1) Has employed or knowingly cooperated in fraud or material deception in order to acquire a license as a speech/language pathologist, audiologist or hearing aid dispenser; has impersonated another person holding a license, or has allowed another person to use that practitioner's license, or has aided or abetted a person not licensed as a speech/language pathologist, audiologist or hearing aid dispenser; to represent himself or herself as a speech/language pathologist, audiologist or hearing aid dispenser.
(2) Has illegally, incompetently or negligently practiced speech/language pathology, audiology or hearing aid dispensing.
(3) Has been convicted of a crime that is substantially related to the practice of speech/language pathology, audiology and/or the dispensing of hearing aids.
(4) A copy of the record of conviction certified by the clerk of the court entering the conviction shall be conclusive evidence therefor.
(5) Has excessively used or abused drugs either in the past 2 years or currently.
(6) Has engaged in an act of consumer fraud or deception; engaged in the restraint of competition; or participated in price-fixing activities.
(7) Has violated a lawful provision of this chapter, or any lawful regulation established thereunder.
(8) Has had the practitioner's license as a speech/language pathologist, audiologist or hearing aid dispenser suspended or revoked, or other disciplinary action taken by the appropriate licensing authority in another jurisdiction; provided, however, that the underlying grounds for such action in another jurisdiction have been presented to the Board by certified record and the Board has determined that the facts found by the appropriate authority in the other jurisdiction constitute 1 or more of the acts defined in this chapter. Every person licensed as a speech/language pathologist, audiologist or hearing aid dispenser in this State shall be deemed to have given consent to the release of this information by the Board of Speech/Language Pathologists, Audiologists and Hearing Aid Dispensers or other comparable agencies in another jurisdiction and to waive all objections to the admissibility of previously adjudicated evidence of such acts or offenses.
(9) Has failed to notify the Board that the practitioner's license as a speech/language pathologist, audiologist or hearing aid dispenser in another jurisdiction has been subject to discipline, or has been surrendered, suspended or revoked. A certified copy of the record of disciplinary action, surrender, suspension or revocation shall be conclusive evidence thereof; or,
(10) Has a physical condition such that the performance of speech/language pathology, audiology or dispensing of hearing aids is or may be injurious or prejudicial to the public.
(b) Subject to the provisions of this chapter and subchapter IV of Chapter 101 of Title 29, no license shall be restricted, suspended or revoked by the Board, and no practitioner's right to practice speech/language pathology, audiology or dispense hearing aids shall be limited by the Board until such practitioner has been given notice, and an opportunity to be heard, in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act [Chapter 101 of Title 29]. (24 Del. C. 1953, § 3618; 59 Del. Laws, c. 206, § 1; 65 Del. Laws, c. 224, § 1; 70 Del. Laws, c. 186, § 1; 72 Del. Laws, c. 266, § 1; 74 Del. Laws, c. 262, § 84; 75 Del. Laws, c. 436, § 43.)
§ 3716. Disciplinary sanctions.
(a) The Board may impose any of the following sanctions, singly or in combination, when it finds that one of the conditions or violations set forth in § 3715 of this title applies to a practitioner regulated by this chapter:
(1) Issue a letter of reprimand.
(2) Censure a practitioner.
(3) Place a practitioner on probationary status, and require the practitioner to:
a. Report regularly to the Board upon the matters that are the basis of the probation.
b. Limit all practice and professional activities to those areas prescribed by the Board.
(4) Suspend any practitioner's license.
(5) Revoke any practitioner's license.
(6) Impose a monetary penalty not to exceed $500 for each violation.
(b) The Board may withdraw or reduce conditions of probation when it finds that the deficiencies that required such action have been remedied.
(c) Where a license has been suspended due to a disability of the licensee, the Board may reinstate such license if, after a hearing, the Board is satisfied that the licensee is able to practice with reasonable skill and safety.
(d) As a condition to reinstatement of a suspended license, or removal from probationary status, the Board may impose such disciplinary or corrective measures as are authorized under this chapter. (72 Del. Laws, c. 266, § 1.)
§ 3717. Hearing procedures.
(a) If a complaint is filed with the Board pursuant to § 8735 of Title 29 alleging violation of § 3715 of this title, the Board shall set a time and place to conduct a hearing on the complaint. Notice of the hearing shall be given and the hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act, Chapter 101 of Title 29.
(b) All hearings shall be informal without use of rules of evidence. If the Board finds, by a majority vote of all members, that the complaint has merit, the Board shall take such action permitted under this chapter as it deems necessary. The Board's decision shall be in writing and shall include its reasons for such decision. The Board's decision shall be mailed immediately to the practitioner.
(c) Where the practitioner is in disagreement with the action of the Board, the practitioner may appeal the Board's decision to the Superior Court within 30 days of service, or of the postmarked date of the copy of the decision mailed to the practitioner. Upon such appeal the Court shall hear the evidence on the record. Stays shall be granted in accordance with § 10144 of Title 29. (24 Del. C. 1953, § 3619; 59 Del. Laws, c. 206, § 1; 63 Del. Laws, c. 151, §§ 10, 11; 65 Del. Laws, c. 224, § 1; 70 Del. Laws, c. 186, § 1; 72 Del. Laws, c. 266, § 1.)
§ 3718. Reinstatement of a suspended license; removal from probationary status; replacement of license.
(a) As a condition to reinstatement of a suspended license, or removal from probationary status, the Board may reinstate such license if, after a hearing, the Board is satisfied that the licensee has taken the prescribed corrective actions and otherwise satisfied all of the conditions of the suspension and/or the probation.
(b) Where a license or registration has been suspended due to the licensee's inability to practice pursuant to this chapter, the Board may reinstate such license if after a hearing, the Board is satisfied that the licensee is again able to perform the essential functions of a speech pathologist, audiologist or hearing aid dispenser, with or without reasonable accommodations, and there is no longer a significant risk of substantial harm to the health and safety of the individual or others.
(c) Applicants for reinstatement must pay the appropriate fees and submit documentation required by the Board as evidence that all the conditions of a suspension and/or probation have been met. Proof that the applicant has met the continuing education requirements of this chapter may also be required, as appropriate.
(d) A new license to replace any license lost, destroyed or mutilated may be issued subject to the rules of the Board. A charge set by the Division shall be made for such issuance. (72 Del. Laws, c. 266, § 1.)
Subchapter III. Other Provisions
§ 3719. Exemptions.
Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent:
(1) Any person from performing industrial hearing screenings under the supervision of a physician licensed in this State.
(2) Any person who is not licensed under this chapter from engaging in the practice of speech/language pathology or audiology in this State, provided that such services are practiced in cooperation with a person licensed under this chapter and shall be practiced for no more than 30 days in any calendar year. The speech/language pathologist or audiologist shall meet the qualifications and requirements for application for licensure described in this chapter, or shall hold a valid license from another state which has requirements equivalent to this chapter, or shall hold a certificate of clinical competence in speech/language pathology or audiology issued by the American Speech, Language and Audiology Association.
(3) Any person who is licensed to practice speech/language pathology, audiology or dispense hearing aids in any other state, district or foreign country who, as a practicing speech/language pathologist, audiologist or hearing aid dispenser, from entering this State to consult with a licensed speech/language pathologist, audiologist or hearing aid dispenser of this State. Such consultation shall be limited to examination, recommendation and testimony in litigation.
(4) Any student of an accredited school or college of speech/language pathology or audiology from receiving practical training under the personal supervision of a licensed speech/language pathologist or audiologist in this State. (36 Del. Laws, c. 210, § 6; Code 1935, § 2736; 14 Del. C. 1953, § 3707; 71 Del. Laws, c. 180, § 167E; 72 Del. Laws, c. 266, § 1.)
§ 3720. Penalty.
A person not currently licensed as a speech/language pathologist, audiologist or dispenser of hearing aids under this chapter, when engaging in the practice of speech/language pathology, audiology and/or dispensing of hearing aids, or using in connection with that person's name, or otherwise assuming or using any title or description conveying, or tending to convey the impression that the person is qualified to practice speech/language pathology, audiology, or dispense hearing aids, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Upon the first offense, the person shall be fined not less than $500 dollars nor more than $1,000 dollars for each offense. For a second or subsequent conviction, the fine shall be not less than $1,000 nor more than $2,000 for each offense. Justice of the Peace Court shall have jurisdiction over all violations of this chapter. (24 Del. C. 1953, § 3622; 59 Del. Laws, c. 206, § 1; 65 Del. Laws, c. 224, § 1; 70 Del. Laws, c. 186, § 1; 72 Del. Laws, c. 266, § 1.)
APPENDIX B

DRAFT OF PROPOSED SPEECH PATHOLOGIST LEGISLATION

AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 24 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO SPEECH/LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, AUDIOLOGY AND HEARING AID DISPENSERS
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:
Section 1. Amend § 3708(a)(1), Chapter 37, Title 24 of the Delaware Code by striking the words “or audiologist” and by replacing “(ASHA); the” with “(ASHA). The”.

Section 2. Amend § 3708(a)(1)a., Chapter 37, Title 24 of the Delaware Code by striking “audiology,”.

Section 3. Amend § 3708(a), Chapter 37, Title 24 of the Delaware Code by re-numbering paragraph “(2)” as paragraph “(3)”.

Section 4. Amend § 3708(a), Chapter 37, Title 24 of the Delaware Code by adding a new paragraph (2) as follows:
“(2) For licensure as an audiologist, has met the national requirements for certification of clinical competence issued by the American Speech/Language Hearing Association, or has been issued board certification from the American Board of Audiology, or its successors. The requirements include:
a. Possession of a master’s degree, or its equivalent, in audiology, or a doctoral degree in audiology, from an accredited college or university. If an applicant has a master’s degree, he or she must also have completed a supervised clinical practicum, in accordance with the Board’s rules and regulations, and a 9-month full-time or 18-month part-time supervised clinical fellowship year, begun after fulfilling academic and clinical practicum requirements.
b. Successful completion of a national examination in the area of the applicant’s specialty prepared by a national testing service and approved by the Division.”

Section 5. Amend § 3708(a), Chapter 37, Title 24 of the Delaware Code by adding a new paragraph (2) as follows:
“(2) For licensure as an audiologist, has met the national requirements for certification of clinical competence issued by the American Speech/Language Hearing Association, or has been issued board certification from the American Board of Audiology, or its successors. The requirements include:
a. Possession of a doctoral degree in audiology from an accredited college or university.
b. Successful completion of a national examination in the area of the applicant’s specialty prepared by a national testing service approved by the Division.”

Section 6. Amend the re-designated § 3708(a)(3), Chapter 37, Title 24 of the Delaware Code as follows:
a. Re-letter paragraph “c.” as paragraph “d.” and paragraph “d.” as paragraph “e.”
b. In paragraph “b.,” add a paragraph break and the letter “c.” between “approved by the Division.” and “An applicant shall.”
c. In the re-designated paragraph “e.,” strike “(a)(2)a. and c.” and replace it with “(a)(3)a., c. and d.”


Section 7. Amend § 3708(b), Chapter 37, Title 24 of the Delaware Code by striking paragraph “(3).”

Section 8. Amend § 3708(b), Chapter 37, Title 24 of the Delaware Code by re-numbering paragraph “(4)” as paragraph “(3).”

Section 9. Amend § 3708(b)(4), Chapter 37, Title 24 of the Delaware Code by striking “(b)(4)” and replacing it with “(b)(3)”.

Section 10. Amend § 3710(a)(1), Chapter 37, Title 24 of the Delaware Code by striking “§ 3708(b)(1), (2), (3) [Deleted] and (4)” and replacing it with “§ 3708(b)(1), (2) and (3)”.

Section 11. Amend § 3710(a)(2), Chapter 37, Title 24 of the Delaware Code by striking “§ 3708(b)(1), (2), (3) [Deleted] and (4)” and replacing it with “§ 3708(b)(1), (2) and (3)”.

Section 12. Amend § 3710(c), Chapter 37, Title 24 of the Delaware Code by inserting the words “or a doctoral degree or its equivalent” between “or its equivalent” and “from a foreign” and by adding the following sentence to the end of the paragraph:
“An applicant for licensure as an audiologist, who has received a degree from a foreign school, college or university, shall have received a doctoral degree or its equivalent and shall submit a certified copy of that applicant’s school, college or university record for evaluation.”

Section 13. Amend § 3713(a), Chapter 37, Title 24 of the Delaware Code by adding the following sentence to the end of the paragraph:
“However, an audiology applicant who has obtained a doctoral degree is not required to satisfy the clinical practicum and CFY requirements and may be issued a temporary license to practice audiology in this State upon completion of the application and payment of the temporary license fee.”

Section 14. Sections 5 and 12 of this Act shall become effective four years after enactment. The remaining Sections of this Act shall become effective upon enactment.
SYNOPSIS
Effective four years after the date of enactment, this bill changes the licensure requirements for audiologists from a master’s degree and completion of a supervised clinical practicum and supervised clinical fellowship to a doctoral degree. Educational institutions are no longer offering master’s degree programs in audiology and the only programs available are doctoral programs. The doctoral program encompasses the practicum and fellowship requirements. Temporary licensure requirements are also amended accordingly. Except for Sections 5 and 12, which become effective four years after enactment, this bill becomes effective upon enactment.



APPENDIX C






Governor’s Task Force on
Licensed Speech-Language Pathologists




Final Report


Representative Valerie Longhurst, Chair

May 20, 2008

Table of Contents

Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………..i

PURPOSE…...……………………………………………………………………………1

BACKGROUND…………………………………………………………………………1

PROBLEM STATEMENT……………………………………………………………….2

TASK FORCE DELIBERATIONS………………………………………………………4

ISSUE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………….7

RECOMMENDED SOLUTIONS……………………………………………………...10

TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS……………………………………………...15

Appendix A: Executive Order 84

Appendix B: Task Force Members

Appendix C: Case for Action

Executive Summary

Executive Order 84 established the Task Force on Licensed Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs) to examine the issues surrounding the shortage of licensed SLPs in the state and to develop recommendations to address the shortage. The Task Force met on six occasions, initially to better understand the issues contributing to the shortage and subsequently to analyze potential solutions and reach consensus on recommendations.

The Task Force acknowledged that Delawareans with communication disabilities are not getting needed services, are experiencing delays in access to services, or are getting services of insufficient frequency and intensity as a result of personnel shortages. In some cases, this exposes practice settings to legal consequences arising from the failure to provide mandated services. In addition, shortages often force existing SLPs to carry exorbitantly high caseloads; this compromises care and makes working conditions untenable. The situation is expected to worsen in coming years due to Delaware’s changing demographics, anticipated retirements from the existing workforce, and the limited number of new SLPs entering the workforce.

Fact-finding revealed that the personnel shortage is not the result of a single factor, but rather of a convergence of factors that impacts the availability of qualified personnel and the ability to retain them in existing positions:
Delaware is one of only three states in the country without a graduate program in speech-language pathology. As the master’s degree is a condition of licensure in the state, Delaware has no in-state “pipeline” for newly-minted graduates.
Although Delaware has an incentive program through the Higher Education Commission, it impacts a limited number of people, and currently there are no data regarding the success of this program in motivating graduates to return to the state to practice.
A number of factors impact the recruitment of qualified personnel to Delaware positions and the retention of those individuals in existing positions. Among these are compensation issues, workplace conditions—including caseload size—and geography. Delaware lacks a coordinated approach to recruitment and retention.
The licensure law restricts the practice of speech-language pathology in Delaware to certified SLPs, precluding practice settings from employing any other providers of service such as speech-language pathology assistants.

The Task Force endorses a multidimensional solution for a multidimensional problem. The following recommendations reflect the Task Force’s commitment to ensure that Delawareans with communication disabilities should receive high-quality speech-language pathology services of adequate frequency and intensity to meet their needs.
Establish a graduate program in speech-language pathology at the University of Delaware.
Establish consolidated recruitment mechanisms.
Establish a mechanism for offering sign-on bonuses for public school positions that incorporates retention incentives (e.g., a payback clause if the individual leaves the position prior to completing the required tenure or the payout of the bonus in installments over multiple years).
Develop materials to attract qualified clinicians to Delaware.
Implement programs designed to attract individuals to careers in communication sciences and disorders.
Analyze the utilization and impact of existing higher education financial incentives to determine whether they are achieving their intended objective.
Examine the ramifications associated with permitting speech-language pathology assistants to practice in Delaware.
Explore the viability of establishing a continuum of professional development opportunities via collaboration among the University of Delaware, Delaware State University, and Delaware Technical and Community College.
Reconvene the Task Force in two years to evaluate progress toward accomplishment of the aforementioned objectives.



PURPOSE

The Task Force was established to examine issues surrounding the shortage of licensed speech/language pathologists in the State of Delaware and to develop recommendations to address the shortage.

BACKGROUND

What is a Speech-Language Pathologist? Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) assess, diagnose, treat, and help to prevent disorders related to speech, language, literacy, cognitive functioning, voice, swallowing, and fluency. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2008-09 Edition, [March 16, 2008] [http://www.bls.gov/oco/]. In educational settings, SLPs collaborate with teachers, special educators, other educational personnel, and families to enhance educational outcomes for students with communication disabilities. In health care settings, SLPs work in conjunction with physicians, social workers, psychologists, nutritionists, and other therapy professionals to help individuals overcome the barriers posed by developmental or health conditions that impact communication.

Most SLP jobs require a master’s degree, and at the present time 240 colleges and universities in the United States offer graduate programs in communication sciences and disorders that are accredited by the Council on Academic Accreditation in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology. Background coursework includes anatomy and physiology; typical and atypical development; principles of speech sciences; and psychosocial aspects of communication. Students also undergo intensive academic training in all dimensions of communication disorders, including assessment and treatment, and participate in 400 hours of supervised clinical training. Delaware is one of only three states nationwide that does not offer a graduate training program within its borders.

Current State of the Practice of Speech/Language Pathology in Delaware. Delaware is one of 47 states that regulate SLPs through license or registration in order to safeguard the public interest. In Delaware, all providers of speech/language services must be licensed by the Division of Professional Regulation, Board of Examiners of Speech/Language Pathologists, Audiologists, and Hearing Aid Examiners. As a condition of licensure, an SLP must have completed a master’s degree or its equivalent at a program accredited by the Council on Academic Accreditation in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, completed 375 hours of supervised clinical practice, completed a supervised Clinical Fellowship year, and passed a national exam. Delaware also requires that clinicians complete 20 hours of continuing education every two years as a condition of license renewal.

PROBLEM STATEMENT

Shortages of qualified SLPs currently plague Delaware and the nation, and the problem is expected to worsen in the coming years. Carlson, E., Brauen, M., Klein, S., Schroll, K., & Willig, S. (2002). Study of personnel needs in special education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2006). 2006 Schools Survey report: Workforce. Rockville, MD: Author. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2007). SLP Health Care Survey 2006: Workforce/work conditions. Rockville, MD: Author. In its Occupational Outlook Handbook, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics indicated that the employment of speech/language pathologists is expected to grow 11% from 2006-2016 due to the general aging of the U.S. population (bringing increased incidence of communication disorders due to stroke, hearing loss, and other conditions), the increased survival rate of infants with significant disabilities, and the increasing number of students requiring special education services in our nation’s schools. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. Muller, E., & Markowitz, J.(2003). Supply and demand of special education personnel: Project Forum synthesis brief. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education. In addition, a significant cohort of SLPs currently practicing are nearing retirement age. In its 2002 Report to Congress, the U.S. Department of Education estimated that almost 50% of school-based SLPs will be eligible for retirement by 2017. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Twenty-fourth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, D.C. The combination of growth in the occupation with anticipated retirements from the profession means that, at the current rate at which new speech/language pathologists are entering the workforce, shortages will continue to be a problem. In fact, the Bureau of Labor Statistics projects a need for approximately 14,000 additional SLPs by 2014.

Delaware’s demographic projections portend a high demand for health care services in the coming decades. Office of the Treasurer, State of Delaware. (2007). Delaware Facing Forward: A Look at Delaware’s Demographic Future. Dover, DE: Author. The state’s population is growing rapidly, and is expected to exceed 1 million by 2030. Ibid.
Delaware is aging faster than the rest of the country, with the 65+ population expected to grow 134% between 2000 and 2030, as compared to a doubling of this population in the United States as a whole. In addition, the population is becoming more diverse, and is shifting from Northern Delaware to the south. Not only will more SLPs be needed to meet these needs, but there will be an even greater demand for bilingual clinicians. The trends also imply that more clinicians will be needed downstate, where recruitment challenges are already pervasive. Statewide, health care settings have found it necessary to offer significant incentives—sign-on bonuses of up to $10,000, school loan forgiveness, stipends for professional development, and so on—in order to attract SLPs to their open positions.

In the coming years, demand will exceed supply not only in health care settings, but also in the schools. Half of the nation’s practicing SLPs work in school settings, Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. yet school-based practice has become increasingly challenging in recent years. The shortage of qualified personnel often results in inordinately large caseload sizes for existing school-based SLPs. The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association recommends that school caseload not exceed 40 under any circumstances, with special populations and circumstances dictating a maximum caseload of 25 or less. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1993, March). Guidelines for caseload size and speech-language pathology delivery in the schools. Asha, 35 (Suppl. 10), 33–39. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2002). A Workload Analysis Approach for Establishing Speech-Language Caseload Standards in the Schools: Guidelines. Rockville, MD: Author. Yet, it is not unusual for school caseloads in Delaware to exceed 100 children per clinician. Obviously, large caseloads pose professional and ethical challenges for SLPs; they compromise SLPs’ ability to provide appropriate and adequate services to students. Ibid. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2006). 2006 Schools Survey report: Special report on workforce and working conditions trends.. Rockville, MD: Author. Holmes, C. (2004, August 4). School districts say need for speech therapists critical. Dover Post. For example, when children need to be seen in groups of five and six in order to fit everyone into the weekly schedule, opportunities for individualized assistance diminish. In addition to onerous caseload sizes, many SLPs are also challenged by the need to provide services in multiple locations, which can be logistically difficult and reduces the time available for student-focused services.

Other difficulties have been cited as contributing to personnel shortages in the schools. Many urban and rural schools have difficulty filling positions. In addition, the salaries for school-based personnel lag behind those of their counterparts in medical settings. Until recently, Delaware SLPs were paid on the same scale as classroom teachers, despite the fact that a bachelor’s degree was the entry-level credential for a teacher and SLPs needed a master’s degree, a supervised clinical fellowship year, and a passing score on a national examination in order to be licensed to practice in Delaware schools. In 2004, the budget bill (S.B. 320) established a salary supplement equal to 6% of an SLP’s base salary for those with national certification practicing in the public schools. Although this salary supplement is not commensurate with that (12%) enjoyed by teachers who have National Board certification, it acknowledges the significant contributions made by SLPs in Delaware’s public schools, and is regarded as a recruitment incentive. Boswell, S., & Crowe, E. (2004, Sept. 21). Delaware adds salary supplement for school-based clinicians. The ASHA Leader, pp. 1, 37-38.

TASK FORCE DELIBERATIONS

The Task Force met on six occasions, first to gain a better understanding of the issues contributing to personnel shortages and then to examine—and eventually recommend—strategies for ameliorating those shortages. At its initial meeting on May 31, 2006, the group reached rapid consensus on the pervasiveness and seriousness of the shortage problem. Many Delaware employers are finding it necessary to offer substantial salaries, highly attractive benefits, and sign-on incentives, and school-based settings are not able to offer commensurate enticements. The lack of a graduate program in communication sciences and disorders in Delaware was seen as a contributory factor, as Delaware loses potential practitioners to out-of-state training programs and, eventually, to out-of-state positions. Several members raised the possibility of expanding the provider base through the use of speech-language pathology assistants (SLPAs) in early intervention and K-12 settings, but concerns were expressed that doing so may compromise the standard of care available to Delaware children. The Task Force identified issues that it wished to examine in greater depth at future meetings, including the career development path for SLPs, the issues related to creating and maintaining an academic program, and the utilization of SLPAs.

At its June 13, 2006 meeting, Beth Mineo from the University of Delaware reviewed the SLP career path and described what UofD offers in the way of a “pre-professional program” in speech-language pathology for undergraduates interested in eventually pursuing a graduate degree. The program affords students access to several undergraduate courses considered to be prerequisites by most graduate programs. Dr. Mineo also provided information on the scope and content of graduate programs in general, and specific information on graduate programs in the region (e.g., Towson, Temple, LaSalle, and West Chester). Tracy Bombara provided an overview on the use of support personnel (e.g., SLPAs) in the delivery of services to people with communication disabilities. She referenced the ASHA guidelines for the training, use, and supervision of SLPAs, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2004). Guidelines for the training, use, and supervision of speech-language pathologist assistants. Rockville, MD: Author. and emphasized that SLPAs are not meant to function as replacements for SLPs, but rather as a means to support implementation of treatment programs. Ms. Bombara emphasized that SLPAs cannot assess or diagnose communication disabilities, develop treatment plans, interpret clinical data, counsel clients or independently report on the status of treatment, select or discharge clients, or disclose clinical and/or confidential information. At the conclusion of Meeting 2, the group requested more in-depth presentations from experts on: 1) beginning and operating graduate programs; and 2) utilizing SLPAs. It was determined that Barbara Amster, Chair of LaSalle’s relatively new graduate program in speech-language pathology, would be invited to talk about her experiences, and Diane Paul from ASHA would be invited to address the SLPA issues.

The October 19, 2006 meeting was devoted to understanding the issues related to the use of SLPAs. Dr. Diane Paul, Director of Clinical Issues in Speech-Language Pathology at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, was the featured speaker. Dr. Paul presented an objective perspective on the use of SLPAs. She noted that SLPAs may enable a practice setting to increase the frequency and intensity of service to clients in need, yet without a clear understanding of the circumstances under which SLPAs appropriately are used, the quality of care may be compromised and clients may be misled into thinking that they are being served by a more highly-qualified provider (specifically, an SLP). ASHA has published guidelines for SLPA training programs as well as for the use of SLPAs in service delivery settings. Of paramount importance is the circumscribed scope of an SLPA’s duties and the requirement for adequate supervision from a certified SLP. SLPAs may not administer diagnostic tests, screen or diagnose individuals for feeding/swallowing disorders, participate in case conferences or interdisciplinary teams without the presence of a supervising SLP, develop or modify treatment plans, provide services beyond the scope of the SLP-developed treatment plan, sign formal documents, select individuals for or discharge individuals from services, disclose confidential information, make referrals, provide counseling or consultation, demonstrate swallowing strategies/precautions, and represent themselves as an SLP. Dr. Paul’s highly interactive presentation dispelled a number of myths, and at its conclusion Task Force members had a much better sense of how SLPAs potentially could contribute to service delivery in Delaware. It is clear that they do not substitute for SLPs, and in fact the utilization of SLPAs would increase—rather than relieve—the demand for SLPs when the responsibility for supervising assistants is added to workloads. An SLP may be able to deploy an assistant to implement treatment plans for some clients, but at the same time must provide all of the other services needed for those clients’ ongoing care as well as provide adequate supervision of the SLPA.

The February 22, 2007 meeting featured Dr. Barbara Amster discussing the establishment of a graduate program in speech-language pathology at LaSalle University. LaSalle’s program accepted its first graduate students only a year after Dr. Amster was hired as the program’s first director, and received full accreditation from ASHA less than four years later. Dr. Amster described the program’s facilities and faculty constellation, and noted that the program is a “cash cow” for the university as students are more than willing to pay full tuition for access to the program; their department’s tuition is the highest of all master’s programs at the university. Admissions are highly competitive, with the program receiving more than 10 applications for each of its available slots, so they are able to be quite selective about the students they accept. She reported that 100% of their graduates find employment, and that 95% of them stay in Pennsylvania. The program has also launched an on-line mechanism for students to complete undergraduate prerequisite courses, and over 1100 credits have already been sold. Amster, B. (2006). LaSalle University’s answer to the SLP shortage: The Pre-SLP Program. Downloaded from http://www.asha.org/NR/rdonlyres/9AB8BD6C-2DF1-4A28-A6B7-8DE7FC5FE2C8/0/Amster.pdf on March 16, 2008.
Dr. Amster was very pragmatic about the challenges inherent in the start-up of a graduate program. She reminded the group of the national shortage of doctoral-level SLPs, which can make the search for qualified faculty more difficult. She also discussed the rigorous process of accreditation, and the decisions to be made regarding the establishment of an on-campus clinic and the use of external clinical affiliation sites. Dr. Amster estimated that start-up costs for a program today would likely be approximately $500,000 in the first year and $300,000 in subsequent years. She concluded her presentation by fielding numerous questions from Task Force members and others in attendance.

The March 26, 2007 meeting addressed multiple issues. Chair Valerie Longhurst provided a recap of the work to date, reviewed a number of issues that contribute to ongoing shortages, and enumerated the impact of shortages on individuals who need services, on SLPs, and on employers. Illene Courtright, former president of the Delaware Speech-Language-Hearing Association, next offered a presentation about recruitment and retention. She emphasized that recruitment to the profession needs to begin before students reach college age, and that many states are having success in recruiting individuals from related professions (such as teachers and paraprofessionals), particularly if they are able to access the supports that they need as they change careers (e.g., flexible schedules, tuition). Mrs. Courtright then identified several recruitment and retention strategies that have proven viable in other states. The meeting concluded with a presentation by Dr. Dan Rich, Provost at the University of Delaware. Provost Rich urged the Task Force to recommend a multidimensional solution because the shortage problem is itself multidimensional. He speculated that having a master’s program in Delaware would not necessarily solve the shortage problem because graduates would be free to leave the state to practice in locations that offered better pay or more attractive working conditions. He suggested that there may be other mechanisms by which Delaware residents could more readily access graduate-level coursework, such as online courses and partnerships with other universities.

The Task Force met on December 7, 2007 to review the information it had assembled since Summer 2006 and to attempt to reach consensus on recommendations. Representative Longhurst identified five primary areas around which recommendations might be generated: 1) the use of SLPAs; 2) recruitment and retention strategies; 3) a graduate program at the University of Delaware; 4) loan forgiveness mechanisms; and 5) marketing. The group reached early consensus that the recommendations must be multifaceted, as no single solution will eliminate the problem of shortages. The general sentiment was that all strategies should be explored further, and every attempt to integrate the activities should be made (for example, coursework for students at the university level could also be offered to professionals for continuing education purposes). The notion of a continuum of professional development programs also emerged at this meeting, with the possibility of multiple Delaware institutions of higher education offering a segment along the continuum. For example, Dr. Diop from Delaware State University indicated that DSU would not be interested in establishing a master’s program, but it might consider an SLPA training program. A summary of the issues considered by the Task Force, and the recommendations arising from the Task Force’s deliberations, can be found below.

Issue Summary

The shortage of SLPs in Delaware has significant ramifications for individuals with communication disabilities, for employers, and for SLPs themselves, and the shortages are expected to worsen in the coming years due to Delaware’s changing demographics, anticipated retirements from the existing workforce, Delaware Department of Labor, Office of Occupational and Labor Market Information. (April, 2007). Delaware 2014: Occupation and Industry Projections. and the limitations in the number of new SLPs entering the workforce. The most disturbing consequence of shortages is that individuals who need services are not getting them at all, experience delays in accessing service, A.I. duPont Hospital for Children reports a four to six month waiting time for an augmentative communication or assistive technology evaluation, a one month wait for a traditional speech-language evaluation, and a six to eight month wait for an oral feeding evaluation requiring a modified barium swallow study. Following evaluation, there is an additional four to six week wait prior to initiation of recommended treatment. or are getting services of insufficient frequency and intensity. In some cases, shortages expose practice settings to legal consequences arising from failure to provide legally-mandated services. It also means that many SLPs in Delaware are carrying exorbitantly high caseloads, which compromises care and makes working conditions untenable. Finally, many employers—schools, hospitals, nursing facilities—have to offer significant incentives to attract and retain SLPs, yet incentives along cannot resolve the shortage if there is an inadequate supply of qualified professionals available.

The shortages are not the result of a single factor, but rather a convergence of factors that impact the availability of qualified personnel and the ability to retain them in existing positions.

Licensure Law

By restricting the practice of speech-language pathology in Delaware to certified SLPs, providers in the state may not legally employ any other providers of speech-language pathology services (e.g., speech-language pathology assistants). The Division of Professional Regulation currently recognizes the position of “speech/language pathology aide,” yet this is essentially a clerical support position requiring no more than a high school degree. Any and all client-related activities performed by the speech/language pathology aide must be conducted under the direct supervision of a licensed SLP. Delaware Code (Title 24, Chapter 37) Thus, employment settings are precluded from utilizing other types of providers in an attempt to mitigate the negative consequences of SLP shortages.

Lack of In-state Graduate Program

Delaware has no “home grown” talent. A master’s degree is required for national certification and state licensure, and Delaware is one of three states in the country without a master’s program. There is a documented tendency for individuals to accept positions within a relatively small geographic radius of their alma mater; LaSalle University reports that 95% of their SLP graduates practice in Pennsylvania. This is understandable, as graduate programs place students in clinical affiliations in the community, which serve to forge important ties between student and worksite. Many students are subsequently hired by the sites at which they interned. This benefits both employer and employee. Without a graduate program, Delaware loses the opportunity to establish a “pipeline” of qualified professionals who have established strong connections with the Delaware community—personal and professional—making it much more likely that they will stay in the region.

Graduate programs in speech-language pathology are costly to operate. In addition to needing faculty capable of covering the breadth of topics required for certification, programs must offer opportunities for extensive clinical practicum experiences. This typically involves a combination of on-campus experiences and off-campus externships. In either setting, intensive supervision by a certified SLP is required. Programs also must afford access to the assessment/treatment materials and instrumentation that graduates will typically use in practice.

LaSalle University’s experience indicates that establishment of a program is hard work but yields numerous positive outcomes. LaSalle’s program is financially viable, has far more applicants than it can accept, and adds to the pool of qualified professionals in Pennsylvania.

Limited Financial Incentives to Offset Cost of Graduate Training

SLP Incentive Program. Although there is an incentive program offered through the Delaware Higher Education Commission, it is limited in scope. The SLP Incentive Program is a loan program in which students can either repay the funds or “pay back” their financial obligation by returning to practice in Delaware early intervention or K-12 settings. Two years of employment are required for each year of funding. It currently offers up to $10,000 annual support, yet some graduate programs charge tuition in excess of $35,000 per year. Since its inception in 1995, the program has never committed more than $50,000 to students in a single year. The program is available only to Delaware residents. In the past 5 years, the program has supported an average of 4 students per year. Several students were supported in two consecutive years; the unduplicated count of students supported in the past five years is 12. Data are not yet available regarding the repayment option students have chosen to exercise. Personal communication, Maureen Laffey, Executive Director of the Delaware Higher Education Commission, March 19, 2008.

Academic Common Market. Delaware is a member of the Academic Common Market, which makes some out-of-state programs available to Delaware residents at the in-state tuition rate of the receiving school. According to the Delaware Higher Education Commission website, there are 11 participating schools that currently offer access to their graduate programs in speech-language pathology; all participating programs are located in the Southeast U.S., and most are located in the Carolinas, Texas, and Virginia. In all cases, access to the programs is not automatic; students must meet selection criteria, and schools are not obliged to use any of their slots for students wishing to use this mechanism. In the past 10 years, 23 students interesting in pursuing SLP master’s degrees have been certified as eligible for the program; Personal communication, Maureen Laffey, March 19, 2008. this means that they met Delaware Higher Education Commission requirements and had been accepted into the receiving school’s graduate program. There are no data regarding whether students matriculated at or received a graduate degree from these schools. Although this mechanism may reduce the cost of graduate education, students who utilize the Academic Common Market are under no obligation to return to Delaware to practice.

Inadequate Recruitment and Retention Mechanisms

When SLP practice settings in Delaware fail to offer the same salaries, benefits, other incentives, and working conditions as those available in surrounding states, it is not surprising that qualified professionals are lost to positions in those states, especially in light of the geographic proximity. In addition, there are simply not enough SLPs to fill existing positions. Better strategies are needed to attract people to the profession as a career option, and to support them as they complete the journey toward certification. Once they are qualified to practice, available positions must offer reasonable salaries, benefits, and working conditions to attract and retain these individuals.

The starting salaries for SLPs in Delaware schools are not competitive with those offered by many districts in MD, PA, and NJ. The caseloads carried by many Delaware school-based SLPs exceed 100. SLPs in the schools are often itinerant, serving multiple schools. They literally work out of their car, transporting materials and paperwork among locations. The time lost in transit is time that could be spent serving students.

Some positions are more appealing than others because of the population served and the geographic location of the facility. Employers in less-desirable settings must entice clinicians with incentives such as sign-on bonuses, payment of professional dues and continuing education expenses, child care benefits, and/or job flexibility.

One of the consequences of inadequate recruitment and retention efforts is an increased reliance on contracted personnel. Many employment sites, desperate to fill open positions, are seeking to do so through contracting agencies, which tend to pay clinicians a higher hourly rate than they can get in salaried positions—particularly in the schools—yet the costs are ultimately passed along to the employer via the fees charged by the agency.

RECOMMENDED SOLUTIONS

The Task Force endorses a multidimensional solution for a multidimensional problem. These recommendations reflect the Task Force’s commitment to ensure that Delawareans with communication disabilities should receive high-quality speech-language pathology services of adequate frequency and intensity to meet their needs. It would violate the intent of the Task Force if any of its recommendation were exploited as a mechanism to erode the quality of services to which Delaware children, youth, and adults are entitled.

With these recommendations, the Task Force seeks to increase the availability of qualified speech-language pathology services providers in the state. The potential mechanisms for doing so include strategies for: 1) attracting out-of-state SLPs to Delaware; 2) attracting highly-qualified individuals to the profession; 3) expanding the constellation of individuals licensed to provide speech-language pathology services; 4) establishing in-state training programs and other supports to attract highly-qualified students and facilitate their long-term connections to the state; and 5) increasing our ability to retain qualified clinicians in Delaware practice settings. As the ensuing information indicates, these mechanisms are interlinked to a great extent.

Attracting Out-of-State SLPs to Delaware

The current lack of professional training programs in the state puts Delaware in the unenviable position of not having a locally-generated supply of qualified providers. Consequently, we must recruit individuals from other states, or hope that other circumstances bring those people—and their professional skills—to Delaware. Apparently, some non-Delawareans labor under some misconceptions about our fair state that need to be dispelled. One strategy endorsed by the Task Force was the development of a generic video touting the benefits of living in The First State. Members speculated that this might be an appropriate undertaking for the Delaware Economic Development Office. Subsequent to the Task Force’s last meeting, DEDO indicated that it plans to create a promotional video about Delaware. This has been endorsed by the Delaware Health Sciences Cluster, a stakeholder group comprised of representatives from Delaware’s health services industries to promote growth in this important part of the economy. Task Force members also endorsed the notion of “consolidated recruitment” in which a single entity would undertake various recruitment activities on behalf of multiple service delivery settings. In addition, Delaware needs to promote the benefits of practicing as an SLP in the state. As one of the reasons for shortages relates to inadequate salaries, benefits, and working conditions, this is a much more complex undertaking. We can, however, promote the fact that SLPs in the schools are eligible for a 6% salary supplement, that there is a strong professional community in the state anchored by the Delaware Speech-Language-Hearing Association, and that abundant opportunities for continuing education are offered through this association.

Targeted incentives might be necessary in order to attract individuals to those positions particularly difficult to fill. In Ohio, for example, sign-on bonuses of $12,000 are awarded to those accepting positions in the hardest-to-staff schools, and they are structured to facilitate retention: the bonus is awarded in increments, with $3,000 each of the first two years in the position, and $6,000 in the third year. Deppe, J. (2007). Recruitment efforts that work: strategies for finding and keeping SLPs. Presentation to the Utah Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Boswell, S. (2007, March 6). Ohio grant addresses personnel shortages: Innovative strategies meet short- and long-term goals. The ASHA Leader, 12(3), 1, 14-15.


Attracting Highly-qualified Individuals to the Profession

The path toward becoming an SLP is a fairly long and challenging one, requiring undergraduate training, graduate training, supervised clinical practice, a Clinical Fellowship Year, and passing performance on a national exam. Few students are certain of their career aspirations when they enter college, and switching mid-stream can cost a student both time and money.

One remedy is to help students recognize their affinity for the profession long before they get to college. This can be facilitated by participation in career days at local schools, at college fairs, and through marketing campaigns emphasizing the rewards inherent in a career as an SLP. Many high schools have chapters of Future Educators of America and/or volunteer clubs focusing on human services, and organizations such as the Council for Exceptional Children and the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association have developed recruitment videos aimed at younger people. Important to this target population are the nature and scope of professional responsibilities and future job prospects, as well as information about schools with training programs and financial aid opportunities. The Delaware Department of Education, through the Higher Education Commission, and the Delaware Department of Labor, through its Office of Occupational and Labor Market Information, provide numerous resources relative to the job market and promising career prospects.

There is a growing interest in the profession of speech-language pathology among career-changers as well. The needs of this group are in some ways different from the younger cohort, as many of them can only contemplate a return to school if they are able to retain an income—or otherwise honor personal or family obligations—while doing so. For example, downstate Delawareans historically have been dissuaded from changing careers because they can not feasibly access the closest graduate programs in Baltimore or Philadelphia and continue to meet their obligations to their families. The time lost in travel to these locations renders pursuit of a graduate degree in speech-language pathology infeasible. Appealing to many career-changers are the opportunities for scheduling flexibility, increased professional impact and/or prestige, and better salaries offered by the new career. Relative to the graduate training they will need to access, programs that afford flexibility in course formats, locations, or scheduling options are responsive to the needs of these students. Financial aid is likely to be an important factor for career-changers as well.

Expand the Constellation of Individuals Licensed to Provide Speech-Language Pathology Services

Several other states have addressed personnel shortages by authorizing the use of speech-language pathology assistants (SLPAs) as an adjunct and/or supplement to the services of a certified speech-language pathologist. The use of SLPAs as interventionists, interpreters/translators, and classroom collaborators may provide a means to supplement services for a diverse population, extend the availability of services, free SLPs to dedicate more time to those with more complex needs, and assist in alleviating the paperwork burden. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2004). The Task Force acknowledges that SLPAs should not be used in place of a certified speech-language pathologist, but may offer an opportunity to utilize the unique qualifications of an SLP to maximum advantage while extending the availability of services through the use of competent assistants. If the state moves in this direction, it will be imperative that training and practice guidelines are established and enforced.

The existing American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) guidelines for the training and use of SLPAs stand as a recommended model for constraining the scope of SLPAs’ practice to those tasks for which they have been trained; the guidelines recommend a minimum of an associate’s degree, and outline a curriculum of required coursework and clinical practica that would constitute the minimum acceptable standard for training. SLPAs need training in typical communication processes, communication disorders, service delivery practices, workplace behavior, and cultural and linguistic factors impacting communication, and ASHA recommends a minimum of 100 clock hours of supervised fieldwork prior to employment. Ibid. ASHA also provides specific guidance regarding the nature and extent of supervision required for SLPAs. For an SLPA in training, the recommendation is no less than 50% direct supervision, and the minimum recommendation for a seasoned SLPA is 20% weekly, with half of that being direct supervision. Direct supervision is defined as “onsite, in-view observation and guidance by the SLP while an assigned activity is performed by support personnel. Ibid.

The Task Force also acknowledged that utilization of SLPAs will increase the workload of the SLPs who will supervise them, and that the caseload/workload expectations for SLPs will need to be adjusted accordingly if the state is to avoid wholesale exodus of SLPs from practice settings in which SLPAs are employed. Adding supervisory responsibilities to SLPs’ workloads also suggests that specialized training will need to be offered to those who have no background or experience in supervision. Delaware currently offers no training program for assistants, raising concern about the lack of a “pipeline” for these professionals as well.

Establish In-state Training Programs

The creation of in-state training programs is responsive to a number of challenges identified by the Task Force. The availability of a graduate program in Delaware would be welcomed by countless students and families in the state as well as in neighboring states. A “pipeline” of students with professional and/or personal ties to Delaware would be established, and that is a critical factor in recruitment and retention. A graduate training program is also likely to contribute to the ongoing professional development of practicing SLPs in the area through course offerings, seminars, and other continuing education opportunities. A graduate program designed with the needs of traditional students as well as career-changers in mind would incorporate creative approaches to completion of academic and clinical requirements while maintaining the high standards required for accreditation. The University of Delaware already offers an undergraduate degree with a speech-language pathology concentration; the Task Force concluded that expansion of that capacity into a graduate program is imperative.

Recognizing the continuum of service delivery needs, the Task Force also recommends that the state explore the creation of a continuum of training options that would prepare not only SLPs but also potentially speech-language pathology assistants. It may be feasible for multiple institutions of higher education to collaborate on the establishment of this leveled approach. For this reason, the University of Delaware, Delaware State University, and Delaware Technical and Community College should engage in collaborative exploration of viable options for a continuum of professional training.

Increasing Retention of Qualified Providers

Many of the same strategies identified relative to recruitment will also support retention of qualified SLPs. Financial incentives such as bonuses for continued service and attractive salary increases based on longevity are one option. Modification of pay scales, acknowledging the extensive training required for national certification as an SLP, is another. Employers might offer relocation expenses or assistance with home ownership (e.g., mortgage assistance programs) or with professional expenses such as professional dues, license expenses, and participation in continuing education opportunities. Financial incentives might also be tied to participation in activities that benefit the employer, such as securing reimbursement for services rendered to Medicaid beneficiaries; the paperwork burden, which often arises from Medicaid reimbursement requirements, is cited by school-based SLPs as their greatest workplace challenge. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2006).

Improvements to the workplace environment, such as the reduction in paperwork, can be important elements in employee retention. Other strategies for improving workplace conditions include: the establishment of caseload caps; a shift from a caseload model to a workload model; the availability of clerical help; access to personal productivity technology and/or technology supporting client assessment and treatment; flexibility in scheduling (e.g., permitting part-time work or job-sharing); the availability of sufficient space appropriate for delivery of professional services; and opportunities for participation in collegial activities such as professional learning communities and study groups. For many individuals, a supportive and respectful workplace environment is just as important as financial considerations. Swain, Harriet. (2006, December 15). Take a break to find your balance: happy work environment to reduce employee turnover. Times Higher Education Supplement 1773, 42-43.


TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS

The Task Force recommends that the state vigorously pursue the following objectives in the interest of increasing the availability and quality of services for Delawareans with communication disabilities:

Establish a graduate program in speech-language pathology at the University of Delaware.
Establish consolidated recruitment mechanisms.
Establish a mechanism for offering sign-on bonuses for public school positions that incorporates retention incentives (e.g., a payback clause if the individual leaves the position prior to completing the required tenure or the payout of the bonus in installments over multiple years).
Develop materials to attract qualified clinicians to Delaware.
Implement programs designed to attract individuals to careers in communication sciences and disorders.
Analyze the utilization and impact of existing higher education financial incentives to determine whether they are achieving their intended objective.
Examine the ramifications associated with permitting speech-language pathology assistants to practice in Delaware.
Explore the viability of establishing a continuum of professional development opportunities via collaboration among the University of Delaware, Delaware State University, and Delaware Technical and Community College.
Reconvene the Task Force in two years to evaluate progress toward accomplishment of the aforementioned objectives.

Appendix A

Executive Order 84Executive Order Number Eighty-Four Creating A Task Force To Study Licensed Speech/Language Pathologists


WHEREAS, it is necessary to have a sufficient number of qualified speech/language pathologists in the State of Delaware; and

WHEREAS, speech/language pathologists in Delaware must be regulated by the state and possess a valid professional license in order to protect the safety and well being and provide high quality services for Delaware citizens; and

WHEREAS, in order to be a licensed speech/language pathologists in Delaware, a person must have earned a Master’s degree or its equivalent from an accredited college or university; and

WHEREAS, such Master’s degree is required to entail a major emphasis in speech language pathology, audiology, communication disorder or speech/language and hearing science; and

WHEREAS, there is no college or university in Delaware that currently offers a Master’s degree with an emphasis in the applicable subjects in order for a person to become a licensed speech/language pathologist in our state; and

WHEREAS, potential licensed speech/language pathologists from Delaware must complete their educational requirements in other states, often finding competitive jobs in our surrounding states and not returning to Delaware to provide such critical services; and

WHEREAS, the demand for licensed speech/language pathologists in Delaware has continued to increase and the demand for licensed speech/language pathologists in Delaware is not being met; and

WHEREAS, the public school system in Delaware, which is vital to the educational development of our children, is currently facing a severe shortage of licensed speech/language pathologists, and there is a need to confront this shortage and develop strategies to address this demand for critical services in our state.

NOW THEREFORE, I, RUTH ANN MINNER, by virtue of the authority vested in me as Governor of the State of Delaware, do hereby declare and order the following:1. A Task Force is created to examine issues surrounding the shortage of licensed speech/language pathologists in the State of Delaware and develop recommendations to address that shortage.

2. The members of the Task Force shall consist of the following:

a. two members of the Delaware House of Representatives appointed by the Governor, one to be appointed from each Caucus;

b. two members of the Delaware Senate appointed by the Governor, one to be appointed from each Caucus;

c. the Secretary of Education for the State of Delaware or her designee;

d. one representative from the Early Childhood and Exceptional Children’s WINK Group in the Department of Education;

e. one representative from the Delaware Department of Health and Social Services;

f. one representative from Easter Seals, appointed by the Easter Seals;

g. one representative from A.I. Dupont Hospital for Children, appointed by the Hospital;

h. the Provost of the University of Delaware or his designee;

i. one representative from the Education Department of Delaware State University;

j. the State Speech/Language Pathologist;

k. one member of the business community appointed by the Delaware State Chamber of Commerce;

l. one representative of the Delaware Speech and Hearing Association’s Executive Council, appointed by the Council;

m. one member of the Governor’s Advisory Council for Exceptional Citizens, appointed by the Council;

n. the Director of Family and Workplace Connection or her designee; and o. one parent of a child in Delaware with developmental and learning needs appointed by the Governor.

All members shall serve during the pleasure of the person or authority appointing them.

3. The Chairperson of the Task Force shall be appointed from among its members by the Governor and serve at the pleasure of the Governor.

4. The Task Force shall develop recommendations for improving the shortage of licensed speech/language pathologists in Delaware, including the identification of revenue sources for the implementation of an accredited Master’s program at a college and/or university in Delaware.

5. The Task Force shall submit its findings to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate and the Governor by June 15, 2006.

Approved: April 13, 2006

Executive Order Number Ninety-One Amending Executive Order Number 84

WHEREAS, by Executive Order Number 84, adopted April 13, 2006, I created a Task Force to examine issues surrounding a shortage of licensed speech/language pathologists in the State of Delaware; and

WHEREAS, the Task Force has commenced its work as contemplated by Executive Order No. 84, but needs additional time to gather facts and obtain the advice and input of national experts on the issues relating the shortage of licensed speech/language pathologists; and

WHEREAS, it is appropriate to extend the deadline for the Task Force to complete its work and render its findings as contemplated by Executive Order No. 84,

NOW THEREFORE, I, RUTH ANN MINNER, by virtue of the authority vested in me as Governor of the State of Delaware, do hereby order and declare as follows:

1. Executive Order No. 84, dated April 13, 2006 is amended by striking Paragraph 5 of the Order in its entirety and replacing it with the following:“5. The Task Force shall submit its findings to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, and the Governor by March 1, 2007.”

2. Except as otherwise provided herein, the provisions of Executive Order No. 84 shall remain effective in their entirety.

Approved and adopted: November 6, 2006


Appendix B

Task Force MembersTask Force Members


Representative Valerie Longhurst (D-Bear) (Chair)

Representative Gregory F. Lavelle (R-Sharpley)

Senator Steven H. Amick (R-Glasgow)

Senator David P. Sokola (D-Newark)

Dr. Martha Brooks, Delaware Department of Education

Dr. Martha Toomey, Delaware Department of Education, Early Childhood and Exceptional Children’s Group

Roseanne Griff-Cabelli, Delaware Birth-to-Three Early Intervention Program, Delaware Department of Health and Social Services

Verna Hensley, Easter Seals

Kim Pierson, A.I. Dupont Hospital for Children

Dr. Timothy Barnekov, University of Delaware

Dr. Abdul-Aziz Diop, Delaware State University

Dr. Beth Mineo, University of Delaware

Samtra Devard, parent of child with developmental and learning needs

Wendy Strauss, Governor’s Advisory Council for Exceptional Citizens

Tracy Bombara, Delaware Speech-Language-Hearing Association

Janet Cates, Delaware Speech-Language-Hearing Association

Jill Nigro, Delaware Speech-Language-Hearing Association

Evelyn Keating, The Family and Workplace Connection


Appendix C

Case for Action


Case For Action

Samtra Devard
Parent of a child with communication disabilities


Delaware families, who have children with special needs in the areas of speech and communication, thirst to find ways to minimize any delays that have been identified in their child.

If there is a delay in the gross motor area, a physical therapist is assigned. Within 1-2 weeks of the assessed need, that child has an appointment scheduled with a therapist and the journey of improving gross motor skills begins. The same can be said for occupational therapy needs for fine motor delays and early childhood education needs for any cognitive delays.

For many families, addressing concerns requiring the services of a licensed speech-language pathologist (SLP) has reached crisis proportion. To have a child with a diagnosed disability or with a measurable delay and not be able to secure the needed resources within a reasonable timeframe causes concern and frustration among families. This circumstance fosters a fear that things might worsen for their child.

Many families have stories of not being able to obtain timely speech therapy services. The stories are the same – an assessment is done and a measurable speech delay or an eating or feeding disorder is identified only to wait for at least three months until an SLP can be made available to service their child.

There is a nationwide shortage of SLPs. It is not unique to Delaware. But what is unique to Delaware is that there is no local institution of higher learning in Delaware to become a Master’s Level Speech-Language Pathologist. Delaware must rely first, on neighboring states to train their SLPs and then on luck to actually recruit them to work in Delaware. Retaining the SLPs that have been recruited is an even far greater challenge.

Families are looking for solutions to this problem.

Service providers are looking for solutions to this problem.

Local and state educators are looking for solutions to this problem.
SLPs are looking for solutions to this problem.